>>11574226

don't worry about how much I write, I'm one of those 99%tile typists whose thoughts go just a bit faster than how fast I type.

no worries on this end.

and yes, as I said that person wrote fan fiction.

so I throw out some assumptions to see how it would respond.

but I maintain that it's a discord script.

and if there are real bakers anymore, I say that there are not, just to see what kind of reaction I get.

or to warn others to proceed with caution.

it's all good.

I hope that the election results are clearer today.

>>11574547

I should have put a (PB) after that link.

sorry please don't say anything.

>>11574591

the 'glitches' were by design.

the 'rule of retrograde' doesn't apply then,

if you believe in such stuff.

>>11574644

'new president' is a provocation of words.

all American's know that a 'new president' doesn't happen till Inaugaration Day.

>>11574686

software could be perfect on either end and use a bad transport and a compromised switch.

when they 'talk back and forth' they switch would change the packets.

It wouldn't be possible (in theory) if the communications are encrypted. but that's a theory that when it's proven false . . . people will 'sit back' on the idea of 'oh, it's secure'.

other ways to cook the election?

a 'single point of failure' is always the issue.

in the case of a comm-system that is for voting one wonders why it wouldn't have a 'constant verify' feature.

if it has a 'send it once and only once' feature?

or checksummed fields that would provide assurance.

but then the 'single point' could be inside the recieving device.

(that place where the 'anomaly' is inserted.

I define, in this case, anomaly as meaning the fact of actual votes not being reported correctly.

anomaly is a better word than 'glitch'

I define, in this case, 'anomaly' as meaning the fact of actual votes not being reported correctly. when miscounted voting only always favors one candidate, across all devices, one must say that these are not anomalies, but cheating and vote-count-rigging.

>>11574850

even responding to that one who says to attack . . .

they so want us triggered and not focused today.

remember, tomorrow is a Federal Holiday.

Veteran's day.

It's a day for Patriots, but it's also a national day of graft for the deep state.

>>11574896

your a cruel and horid dolt.

stuttering is no indication of anything except for distress at being demanded-of.

and often those who do stutter have a far superior ability to reason and do real things that don't involve bullying and being a control meister.

>>11574933

the stuttering is not from lack of intelligence, anon. and you know this.

often if someone suffers a trauma it happens.

and if or if not I am, really why would you need that information? except to want to use it against me later.

think whatever you want.

the stutterer can become Emperor, it's happened.

and maybe a good one too.

so back off with your bullying of ideation, idea-butcher of meanness uncalled-for, you rot your self in your soul where it matters by playing that roll. And that would be as true if I said it while stuttering or if I said it in a way that gets approved of by the committee on effective discourse for public broadcast.

>>11575017

The Emperor Claudius