is this org real or setup?

White supremacist group distributes flyers on San Antonio’s North Side

A white supremacist organization dropped more than 1,000 flyers denouncing abortion, the Black Lives Matter movement and other issues in Hollywood Park and San Antonio’s North Side early Sunday, according to the group.

San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg denounced the flyer distribution in a statement Sunday evening, saying “racism and hatred are not welcome here.”

“San Antonio is a city of inclusion, compassion and strength through diversity,” he said. “We will work together to root it out whenever they appear, and that includes the actions of white supremacists.”

Hollywood Park Police Chief Shad Prichard said the flyers included information on how to join the group’s cause but did not suggest that there were plans for violent action or gatherings in the area.

Prichard said police were collecting the flyers and “reaching out to our federal partners to share our findings and will monitor the situation to ensure the safety of our residents.”

FBI Special Agent and Public Affairs Officer Michelle Lee said the FBI is aware of the flyer distribution and is “coordinating closely” with Prichard.

The group, called 14First the Foundation, is a self-proclaimed racist organization with about 500 members nationwide, according to Ronald Murray, 14First’s vice president. Members distributed at least five variations of flyers throughout Hollywood Park, Oak Haven Heights, Stone Oak and nearby areas, he said.

The flyers “are promoting the white race and encouraging members of white communities to stand up and not allow the genocide and brutalities that are occurring to the white community at the hands of minorities to continue to happen solely because they are white,” Murray said.

At least some of the flyers include Nazi-style swastikas and the group’s phone number, urging sympathizers to get involved.

Murray said that since the distribution, the organization has received more than 40 calls, most from people complaining about the content of the flyers or about what they considered unwelcome solicitation. The group had tossed the flyers onto people’s driveways from a moving vehicle.

Law enforcement had not contacted them as of Sunday afternoon, he said.

Murray said the flyer drop was “absolutely not” inspired by the presidential election, which resulted in a victory Saturday for Joe Biden over President Donald Trump. 14First had planned the distribution in advance, and the timing was simply a coincidence, he said.

The organization’s members believe that the U.S. is headed toward a revolution that will “bring this country back to some sort of moral decency,” Murray said.

Flyers criticized abortion rights, the Black Lives Matter movement, the role of Jews in the media and the death of Cannon Hinnant, a white 5-year-old boy who was shot and killed in North Carolina in August. A Black man is accused in his death.

Murray said 14First does not condone violence and that members who engage in violence are kicked out. The group holds rallies and protests, but it does not have any planned for the rest of the year.

“The ultimate (goal) is to see people open up their eyes and educating their youths that it’s perfectly fine to be proud that you are white,” he said.

https://www.expressnews.com/news/local/article/White-supremacist-group-distributes-flyers-on-San-15711765.php

Gov. Greg Abbott doesn't acknowledge Joe Biden as president-elect, calls for vote-counting and recounts to continue

In his first comments on the presidential election since election night, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott avoided acknowledging former Vice President Joe Biden's victory and said the process of vote counting and recounts should play out.

“Democracy depends upon fair and open elections. We all agree that every legal vote counts and that illegal votes do not. There are processes in place in each state to determine if any vote is legal, and we must respect those processes to ensure the integrity of our elections,” Abbott said in a written statement Monday evening.

Abbott’s statement comes days after major news outlets called Biden president-elect on Saturday as results indicated that he would win the swing state of Pennsylvania and secure enough electoral votes to ascend to the presidency.

Trump has not conceded, claiming the election was stolen and making unsubstantiated claims of widespread voter fraud. The sitting president's campaign has filed legal challenges to contest the election results in battleground states. Judges in two of those cases — in Michigan and Georgia — tossed out the lawsuits because the campaign failed to provide evidence that laws were broken. Trump's campaign has indicated that it will call for recounts in Michigan and Wisconsin, and recounts are also possible in Georgia and Pennsylvania. Still, experts say his odds of winning are practically impossible.

Former President George W. Bush, a fellow Republican and former governor of Texas, congratulated Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris on their victory Sunday and called the outcome of the election “clear.” But many other Republicans have disputed or questioned the results, and some have parroted Trump's unsubstantiated claims of fraud.

Abbott avoided making such claims but said that election winners are "certified by designated governmental bodies, not by media outlets."

"Resolving disputes over vote counts is not uncharted territory," Abbott said. "It happens frequently, including in presidential contests like the one asserted by Al Gore. Regardless of party affiliation, or no party affiliation, all Americans must have confidence in the accuracy and transparency of our elections. That can be achieved, and must be done swiftly."

The state's senior U.S. senator, John Cornyn, made similar comments Monday when asked whether he'd seen evidence of voter fraud in the presidential election.

“That’s really not my, my role,” Cornyn, a Republican, told reporters on Capitol Hill. “There is a process that is available, and I don’t begrudge the president for availing himself of that process — but in the end, they’re going to have to come up with some facts and evidence.”

Abbott, meanwhile, has been quicker to congratulate winners in Texas elections, even though votes are still being counted and canvass deadlines have not arrived. Early Wednesday morning, Abbott congratulated state Rep. Angie Chen Button, R-Richardson, for winning reelection. Her opponent has not yet conceded and will be able to call for a recount if she chooses. As of Monday, Button was up by 223 votes, or about 0.3%.

https://www.texastribune.org/2020/11/09/greg-abbott-presidential-election/

I Was In Philadelphia Watching Fraud Happen. Here’s How It Went Down

Legacy media are lying when they claim that all of President Trump’s allegations of voter fraud are baseless. I know, because I argued a case on the president’s behalf in federal court in Philadelphia.

At issue was President Trump’s request for an order changing the way Pennsylvania absentee and mail-in ballots are being reviewed at the Philadelphia Convention Center. CNN and others claim he “lost.” That’s false: he won. As I made that argument on behalf of the president’s campaign, I can tell you what really happened.

President Trump went to court about two problems: First, only a handful of Republican observers—substantially fewer than the Democrats had there—were being admitted to the room at the Philadelphia Convention Center where inspections were being conducted. Second, the few who could get in weren’t permitted to get close enough to see what was actually happening. The most important questions all have to ask are: Why all the hiding? What’s being hidden?

At the Convention Center counting location, I personally observed dozens of Trump campaign volunteers being barred from the counting room even though they’d been properly registered as observers. That’s why I urged Pam Bondi and Corey Lewandowski, who were on the scene, to authorize the filing of a request that a federal court order the Board of Elections to stop this nonsense.

More hiding: despite a binding order of the state’s Commonwealth Court, the handful of Republican observers who could get into the room weren’t being allowed up to the barrier set at six feet from the closest tables where work was being done. So even though they were in the room where it was happening, they had no way to tell what was happening. If there’s no fraud, why is the Democrat-controlled Board of Elections unwilling to let people get close enough to actually see what its people are doing?

So on a borrowed laptop at around 2 p.m. on election day, I typed up a very short document to start a federal lawsuit and to request that the federal court intervene to prohibit these unfair practices. At about 4:30 p.m., its filing was authorized by the campaign.

The federal judge ordered a hearing that began at 5:30 p.m. and went for two hours. In open court, the judge compelled the Board of Elections to agree that the Republicans could have up to 60 representatives in the room. That was a huge victory, not only for Republicans but for anyone who actually wants to have a vote tabulation worthy of belief.

He also compelled the board to agree that all observers, Democrat or Republican, could get up to the six-foot barrier. While the Democrats claimed that of course, of course, they had always been letting people in and letting them up to the barrier, I had a long list of witnesses who were prepared to testify that this was false. The judge told the defendants pointedly that if they didn’t do what they’d promised in his courtroom they would, he had plenty of authority to make them keep their word.

Having secured this agreement from the Board of Elections, the court dismissed the president’s motion for court-ordered relief as moot. Courts often do that when they secure an agreement between the parties. It means the court doesn’t have to issue an order, which would be appealable, granting or denying the motion, and it means the court doesn’t have to write an opinion. What it doesn’t mean is that the request made on behalf of President Trump to stop the election fraud was moot, despite the false spin CNN and other mainstream media put on it. All of this was a victory for President Trump and anyone else who believes in open government.

I’m no longer surprised by anti-Trump non-news coming from the likes of CNN. But I cannot imagine why Pennsylvania Republican leaders have suggested there’s no reason to think that anything wrong or fraudulent is going on in the counting of Pennsylvania’s votes.

If that were true, why in the world would the Democratic-controlled city government be working so hard to keep Republicans out of the room where those votes are being counted? In a world where every car that drives down the street is on video, why isn’t all of this counting being conducted in broad daylight, under watchful eyes? What do they have to hide?

Other people have gathered substantial evidence that there are indeed things to hide, including this video showing, among other things, footage of government officials wearing Joe Biden facemasks filling in blanks in already-submitted mail-in votes. The hearing I attended wasn’t about that, but it was about the conditions that make that possible.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/10/i-was-in-philadelphia-watching-fraud-happen-heres-how-it-went-down/

Jeanine Pirro

@JudgeJeanine

MY TWEET CENSORED when my friend tweeted SAME words and her tweet NOT CENSORED!!!!

Algorithms? No

They censor PEOPLE !!!!

https://twitter.com/JudgeJeanine/status/1326157872712077313