Anonymous ID: 5ad9d8 Nov. 10, 2020, 9:32 a.m. No.11576817   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6841 >>6898

TYB

 

>>11576788 (pb)

It's not indoctrination. It's correlation and cultural movements that you can see with your own eyes. Foreign boomers, especially in Asia, have their own cultural movements. But American boomers were distinctly infiltrated by commies. It's not complicated.

Anonymous ID: 5ad9d8 Nov. 10, 2020, 9:47 a.m. No.11577027   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7095

>>11577008

Faux Intellectual? It's just definitions. There's nothing intellectual about it. Gnostics were a distinct sect that de-emphasize material reality and only emphasized mysticism and spiritual reality. We need both. Their denial of the physical was their heresy.

 

But Gnostic isn't a word for all heretics.

Anonymous ID: 5ad9d8 Nov. 10, 2020, 9:58 a.m. No.11577201   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11577174

She's at least saying the case for fraud should move forward. Nothing "clownish" about that. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day, etc.. I'm not so "all or nothing" that it kills me to mention this about her.

Anonymous ID: 5ad9d8 Nov. 10, 2020, 10:04 a.m. No.11577285   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7341 >>7490

>>11577178

Get a hint because you called me a "Karen"? You're going to use tiktok tier normie memes and act like it's some special codeword here? WTF is wrong with you? I asked you to speak plainly. That's it. What is it that set you off for defining Gnosticism? I'm not even the original OP who pushed any hint of supposed Gnosticism, but you targeted me for simply defining it.