>>11583853 lb
>Did Q verify the clock ?
it was his idea to begin with, but how exactly it works was left to anons.
there is a system shared in the clockfags thread, and it has some connections sometimes, but i can't recall Q giving much of a nod on that front
tuckerface before
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: c9daa0 No.7958 📁
Jan 6 2018 15:52:55 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 0c0027 No.7935 📁
Jan 6 2018 15:50:17 (EST)
>>7930
Does this mean Ronald Reagan, Q?
>>7935
Timestamp.
Decipher.
Think clock.
Wind the clock w/ all markers.
Relevant.
Future proves past.
Q
Dec 18 2017
370
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 82d434 No.121559 📁
Dec 18 2017 23:58:04 (EST)
Anonymous ID: d3b6f7 No.121553 📁
Dec 18 2017 23:57:15 (EST)
What happened on 12/7?
>>121553
Clock started- 10 days.
Q
etc, etc
solid post.
fake
bruh. ok, it's a real porno, with a lazy paste-over of aoc's face.
not a deep fake, more a shallow fake
oh, i'd agree there can be and is more than one way for "the clock" to work, as there is no true consensus on the most used working model.
have at it, fresh takes always welcomed
controlled laughing point? appear weak etc?
UNITED GLITCH OF AMERICA
treu if gib
grate minds, and all that contemporary jazz