dChan
Anonymous ID: c03f66 Nov. 11, 2020, 6:42 a.m. No.11591216   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11591174

Activate division shill script

[Last Name, First Name] is a ==[Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}], committed {Sin{crime}}.

I mention [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }}] because "it's a fact" that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

You need to read my words repeating that a person is nothing but a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}]. Keep [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.

Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code rules is to call YOU a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] person trying to defend [Last Name, First Name].

As I said before, [Last Name, First Name] being a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtapose [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] to a person, because it is a fact.

I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race or religion or class or political affiliation, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about [Last Name, First Name] being [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] as me trying to increase division by repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], and then my shill code is to reduce you to 'a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] shill trying to defend [Last Name, First Name] who is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So to reiterate, since it is a fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there is nothing deceitful going on in my repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there is [Last Name, First Name (z1)] who are not [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So on free speech boards like this one, any other poster who challenges me for pointing out the 'damning information' that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code is to dismiss all of them as themselves [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] who are only saying what they're saying to distract me and others from pointing out the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

Anonymous ID: c03f66 Nov. 11, 2020, 6:55 a.m. No.11591396   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1458

>>11591376

 

Activate division shill script

[Last Name, First Name] is a ==[Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}], committed {Sin{crime}}.

I mention [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }}] because "it's a fact" that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

You need to read my words repeating that a person is nothing but a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}]. Keep [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.

Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code rules is to call YOU a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] person trying to defend [Last Name, First Name].

As I said before, [Last Name, First Name] being a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtapose [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] to a person, because it is a fact.

I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race or religion or class or political affiliation, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about [Last Name, First Name] being [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] as me trying to increase division by repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], and then my shill code is to reduce you to 'a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] shill trying to defend [Last Name, First Name] who is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So to reiterate, since it is a fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there is nothing deceitful going on in my repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there is [Last Name, First Name (z1)] who are not [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So on free speech boards like this one, any other poster who challenges me for pointing out the 'damning information' that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code is to dismiss all of them as themselves [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] who are only saying what they're saying to distract me and others from pointing out the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].