Anonymous ID: b2eb26 Nov. 11, 2020, 7:26 a.m. No.11591778   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1849

>>11591072 (PB)

Regarding Scorecard and the Hammer - this anon is not convinced they exist as such.

 

Given the number of different products in use across all the States (Dominion is but one of many), Scorecard is more likely to be a set of design principles / requirements / algos for use in voting terminals and aggregation databases. I can't see it being a discrete product in its own right. The GEMS software has the ability to cap votes for a candidate at x% and also to represent voters as fractions. A Dem voter for instance can be input as 1.4 and a Republican voter as 0.6. Both will show up with a value of '1' if no decimal places are selected on display (default). When tallying votes, they have a very different weighing.

 

Similar for the Hammer. Brennan's Hammer is a massive database used for storing harvested data which can be used for blackmail purposes. As far as voter fraud goes, a back-end database is needed for storing historical trends, to ensure that Scorecard is not configured in such a way as to alert the forensic chaps. Dominion et al all have back-end DBs. I therefore suspect that Hammer too is a set of design principles / requirements / algos.

Anonymous ID: b2eb26 Nov. 11, 2020, 7:39 a.m. No.11591951   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1999

>>11591849

Been there, done that.

 

The behavior that's been reported around the use of Dominion - systems going down, etc just doesn't add up. The guy who broke the Hammer to the world (Denis Montgomery) describes it as a set of tools for spying. At the practical vote-counting level, this is no use in fixing an election.