Anonymous ID: 42b2ff Nov. 11, 2020, 9:25 a.m. No.11593382   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3610

Deutsche Bank Proposes A 5% "Work From Home" Tax

 

At a time when the Fed is already monetizing the entire US budget deficit thanks to helicopter money, sparking conversations about the utility of taxation, and when a Biden administration is set to at least try and roll back most of the Trump tax cuts, the last thing the population wants to hear about is even more taxes.

 

Yet in a "modest proposal" from Deutsche Bank, the bank argues that in a time of pervasive covid shutdowns, "those who can work from home (WFH) receive direct and indirect financial benefits and they should be taxed in order to smooth the transition process for those who have been suddenly displaced."

 

In other words, the argument goes that working from an office is somehow punitive, and since WFH during the pandemic leads to "many benefits" as a resulting "disconnecting themselves from face-to-face society" a 5% tax for each WFH day "would leave the average person no worse off than if they worked in the office." The bank calculates that such a tax could raise $49bn per year in the US, โ‚ฌ20bn in Germany, and ยฃ7bn in the UK. "That can fund subsidies for the lowest-paid workers who usually cannot work from home."

 

In the report written by DB strategist Like Tumpleman, he argues that the popularity of WFH was growing even before the pandemic: "between 2005 and 2018, internet technology fuelled a 173 per cent increase in the number of Americans who regularly worked from home. It is true that the overall proportion of people working from home before the pandemic was still small, at 5.4 per cent based on census data, but the growth was still way ahead of the growth in the overall workforce."

 

Naturally, the covid shutdowns have turbocharged that growth, and as a result the proportion of Americans who worked from home increased ten-fold to 56% during the pandemic. Many of these people will continue to work remotely for some time. Indeed, two-thirds of organizations say that at least three-quarters of their staff can work from home effectively, according to S&P Global Markets. Meanwhile, a DB survey shows that, after the pandemic has passed, more than half of people who tried out WFH want to continue it permanently for between two and three days a week.

 

This sudden shift to WFH means that, for the first time in history, "a big chunk of people have disconnected themselves from the face-to-face world yet are still leading a full economic life" as if that is somehow a bad thing.

 

It gets crazier: the bank claims that working in the comfort of oneโ€™s own home leads to a slew of financial benefits including:

 

-financial savings on expenses such as travel, lunch, clothes, and cleaning.

-indirect savings via forgone socializing and other expenses that would have been incurred had a worker been in the office.

-intangible benefits of working from home, such as greater job security, convenience, and flexibility.

There is also the benefit of additional safety.

 

As if it is difficult to find someone who also sits in front of a computer all day long in Bangladesh and has the exact same skill-set but would work for a fraction of the pay.

 

Yet those people who are working remotely are, according to DB, the equivalent of social parasites as they "contribute less to the infrastructure of the economy whilst still receiving its benefits" potentially extending the slump in national growth. In other words, the mere act of working from home makes you guilty of not propping up the economy!

 

That, according to Templeman "is a big problem for the economy as it has taken decades and centuries to build up the wider business and economic infrastructure that supports face-to-face working. If a great swathe of assets lie redundant, the economic malaise will be extended."

 

In short, those who failed to develop the appropriate skill-set and are "forced" to work in society - mostly employees of service companies - and who were unable to refused to educate and train themselves to be able to "enjoy" the benefits of work from home jobs which incidentally include sitting in front of a computer for hours on end and in some notable cases masturbating in front of a zoom conference call, have to be rewarded monetarily by all those who are lucky enough to not have to work in public.

 

While it would be easy to laugh and merely brush this idea off as another ridiculous policy proposal from a bank whose very existence would be very much in question had it not been for several rounds of generous taxpayer funded bailouts, since this is yet another grossly socialist proposal we are concerned it has a very high probability of passage not only in Europe but also in the US, especially if Democrats manage to pull of a "Blue wave" sweep in Georgia in January.

moar

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/deutsche-bank-proposes-5-work-home-tax

Anonymous ID: 42b2ff Nov. 11, 2020, 9:42 a.m. No.11593657   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

SAM119 USAF G5 departing Colorado Springs Muni Airport (not the Peterson AFB side) after an overnight from Houston-Ellington Airport and a departure of Patrick AFB earlier in the day

This AC was SAM942 and accompanied POTUS over the last several days of the campaign stops-it was usually out front

It has also accompanied AF2 in the same role in Sept.

 

This AC is very high up the "food chain" with regards to transporting VIP's and serving in a support role for both POTUS and VP.