>>11595591 lb
I'm no politician.
I called you Reddit because you space like a faggot.
Otherwise, no, I think this conversation is helpful.
I have no proof of anything that I claim. I just think most are confused about the modern state of politics and have grandiose ideas about how we can "fix things" despite thinking little about drawbacks of potential "fixes".
I don't have any investment either way, I just don't see a point in pulling the cart before the horses.
>>11595569 lb
Which parts of this can we derive an "evil" interpretation of the character of Nimrod from?
Doesn't Ba'al just mean Lord, like Belus?
We need to pierce through the differences between what we today think of as "evil" and the vacancy of explanation that offers us this explanation.
Did ancients record this guy as having been some sort of evil doer, or are we relying on modern interpretations to define on our behalf what "evil" is?
I don't mean to take a position of any kind. I'm just cautious when it comes to the Thelemic inspirations that often cloud comprehension in these arenas.
What is a weeaboo and why did chan-goers coin the term?
What is /a/? How long has it been around? Do any anons ever go from one board to another, or are they only allowed to view boards of their primary interest?
You're impotent here. Too many of us can see past your preferred consensus.
>he vacancy of explanation that offers us this explanation.
I meant to say "that offers us this interpretation".
What a wonderful question!
Doesn't Nancy have staff that super coincidentally works for Dominion? Or was it Hillary?
kek you fucked up the script
but, naw, anons have long used anime images
animebaker replies too much to people looking to provoke him, sure. there's no disputing that.
however, animebaker is certainly better than comms…
Reddit requires a double space to move to the next line.
It's generally just a way to poke fun at people. I never take it that seriously, hence my giving you (You)s.
I'd just rather preserve the culture here than ensure your feelings are in tact. Don't take it the wrong way, anon.
Literally just go to /a/, anon…
You think every single person on that board is in to loli shit?
Did you ever stop to think that animebaker has only continued the trend because it pisses people like you off?
Yes, animebaker should certainly reply to people less and try to provoke people less as it leads to inevitable slides and causes further confusion like this, but that doesn't mean we should paint animebaker this way.
Call them a weeaboo and be done with it like we always used to.
>continue to explain chan culture to me
Do you really want that?…
Surely it's just coincidence!
I'm asking, what if there was a particular Ba'al, or Lord, that had a negative view associated with him?
I fully comprehend Nimrod Semiramis Tammuz.
The bull is also symbolic of Taurus or Molech, which have their respective interpretations.
The Ram is Pan or Cernunnos as well.
Dionysus, like Jesus, was resurrected after three days and born of a virgin.
I don't know enough about Bacchus to present potential friction.
I just don't understand how normies, who know so little about the adjacent territory, will ever be able to think this all through without someone having to tell them, "yeah, that's a good guy/bad guy".
I totally understand what you're compiling, but I just don't see how it's enough for someone that has no foundation and there are too many overlaps that offer us contradictions to just lay it all out so easily.
I don't mean to suggest who wrong you are or anything, I just don't see how we can satisfy even devil's advocates with such a lacking explanation.