Anonymous ID: c96ac0 Nov. 11, 2020, 2:52 p.m. No.11598170   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8205 >>8253 >>8262

>>11598107

FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE

 

https://twitter.com/AP

 

NOWHERE ON AP'S TWITTER PAGE

 

NO SAUCE IS THE GIVEAWAY

Anonymous ID: c96ac0 Nov. 11, 2020, 3:09 p.m. No.11598415   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11598368

Hillary isn't Jewish.

 

The fake narrative of Hillary having "Jewish roots" is based on her maternal grandmother remarrying a Jewish man AFTER her mother was born.

 

This is pathetic gaslighting.

 

Satanists are not Jews you lying fuck.

Anonymous ID: c96ac0 Nov. 11, 2020, 3:27 p.m. No.11598667   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://twitter.com/MattWolking/status/1326219193667231744

 

Twitter: "There is no evidence that thousands of dead people voted in the 2020 US elections in Wayne County, Michigan, according to fact-checking by CNN and PolitiFact. There is also no evidence that a substantial number of votes were fraudulently cast by dead people in Pennsylvania, The New York Times and FactCheck.org report."

 

This doesn't 'dispute' the original Tweet either in form or content.

 

  1. Neither "factcheck.org" nor CNN nor PolitiFact nor the NYT are 'official' sources as to whether or not fraud took place.

 

  1. Claiming there were 'not thousands' or 'not substantial number of dead people on voting ballots DOES NOT EVEN ADDRESS THIS PARTICULAR CASE.

 

Twitter 'disputes' this with fake sources and fake straw men.

 

It would be like 'disputing' "OJ killed his wife" by saying

 

"Bobo the dancing clown disputes this assertion, it is not true that OJ killed thousands of people or a substantial number of people".

 

Twitter is run by total morons.

Anonymous ID: c96ac0 Nov. 11, 2020, 3:36 p.m. No.11598798   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8820

>>11598750

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

CHINA'S NARRATIVE DOES NOT USURP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.