Anonymous ID: 5eeca3 Nov. 11, 2020, 9:31 p.m. No.11604550   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4897

>>11604353

Why in the world would they do anything like that?

They could just print in invisible ink "THIS VOTE'S REAL MUDDAFUKKAS!!". Or they could just add a secret tracer to the black ink. Or, if they're worried that chemical secrets can't be kept secure and want to add a crypto components they could do a invisabel ink barcode of HASH256(serial_number + secret_salt)+serial_number. That would gave every ballot a unique mark that could be easily validated if you have the secret_salt and be impossible to even fake otherwise.

We immediately knew the QFS blockchain watermarking story was bullshit because blockchains, related to finial-reset porn or otherwise, have no application here and certainly don't allow paper marked with such data to be magically tracked.

Anonymous ID: 5eeca3 Nov. 11, 2020, 9:58 p.m. No.11604809   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4825

>>11604778

>223 is a civilian round 5.56x45 is mil round… they are different but both can be fired from the same rifle…

Oh boy.

A wise man once said, "There are no pedants like gun pedants."