Anonymous ID: 70b7fd Nov. 11, 2020, 10:46 p.m. No.11605195   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5217 >>5219 >>5238

here's a question.

most courts say you must have a 'legal standing', when filing a lawsuit, injunction, or anything related.

 

isn't that in violation of the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution?

 

You should be able to sue on the basis of a law being unjust, and in violation of the Constitution, not because some cabal of judges acting like bureucrats saying soโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 70b7fd Nov. 11, 2020, 11:24 p.m. No.11605467   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11605421

 

it's a 'gotcha'. if Biden's determined to be a national security risk, giving him 'security briefings' when he's neither president-elect, nor suitable for receiving such information, would be a violation of federal law.

 

more nails for the coffin, really.

Anonymous ID: 70b7fd Nov. 11, 2020, 11:37 p.m. No.11605586   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

you have to wonder, though. if the KP is being posted, how close are we to a big boom? there's been lots of digging regarding the election fraud. more and more people are waking up.

 

still, the KP is where I draw the line. o7