Anonymous ID: 944147 Nov. 12, 2020, 12:41 a.m. No.11606067   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6074 >>6077 >>6079 >>6082 >>6108 >>6183

Hey, folks. I dunno if you guys saw Scott Adams today, but he indicated that he was privy to some "big" information that will be coming out soon, information which will prove that the election was rigged.

It's a long video, so I included a timestamp below. I'd suggest watching the whole thing, since it's a solid video, but here you go:

>23:10

At 23:10, Scott indicates that he has seen "a little more than you've seen," something which he repeats later. To quote the video, "There's some stuff coming that is different from the stuff you've seen."

What, exactly, is coming, do you think? Scott is insinuating that more information is coming which is qualitatively different, and different in scale, from the evidence of fraud we've already seen.

Anonymous ID: 944147 Nov. 12, 2020, 12:45 a.m. No.11606089   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11606074

It's very good. Scott covers the media hypnotism as well as speculating on the 2 different realities the left and the right are inhabiting right now.

The important part, though, is @ 23:10. Scott specifically indicates that he has seen something BIG. What do you think that is?

It's hidden in a video well-over an hour long, but he does say it a few times over the course of that video.

Scott specifically says that something MAJOR is coming that indicates the fraud, something which constitutes much stronger evidence that what is seen so far.

Anonymous ID: 944147 Nov. 12, 2020, 12:48 a.m. No.11606108   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11606067

I found another timestamp. 37:10.

"There's something coming in the next week that's CLEARLY true"

Whatever it is, he is clearly insinuating that it constitutes stronger evidence than that which we have seen so far.

Anonymous ID: 944147 Nov. 12, 2020, 12:57 a.m. No.11606150   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>former friends don't even want to talk to me because I'm a "QAnon supporter" and Q is apparently a "white supremacist"

At least now I know who my real friends are you commie bastards.

Anonymous ID: 944147 Nov. 12, 2020, 1:03 a.m. No.11606177   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6181 >>6195 >>6216 >>6380

>come to board flooded with MILINTEL, every 3-letter agency, ostensibly the President of the United States and those close to him, hackers, law enforcement, veteran Anons, foreign agents, spies, and a bunch of vehement pedophile hunters

>a place where even good actors are afraid to dox themselves or reveal their identities

>post child pornography

Has anyone ever considered how the hell they get away with it? Either these shills are outside US jurisdiction or they have some kind of special permission. Or maybe they're just THAT ballsy. Seriously, HOW do they have the balls to post THAT of all things HERE of all places? Are they just that confident they'll win?

You'd imagine posting CP on /qresearch/ would be suicidal.

Anonymous ID: 944147 Nov. 12, 2020, 1:12 a.m. No.11606211   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6236

>>11606181

I've thought about this for a while. I think you're right. The people posting actual child porn are likely foreign actors in places outside US jurisdiction.

Which makes me wonder why they even bother posting lolicon. Why not just go straight for PTHC if you really want to disrupt the place?

My thought is this: The ones posting drawn loli may, in fact, be within the United States or some other punishable jurisdiction, VPN or no, and they're posting something that is legal in their state as a precaution against arrest.

I remember a bunch of flood breads in the catalog within recent memory claiming to be ANTIFA. If those were legit, then maybe ANTIFA are goreposters or loli spammers.

We shall see. In any case, I'm still shocked at the balls of these idiots.

Anonymous ID: 944147 Nov. 12, 2020, 1:19 a.m. No.11606245   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6249 >>6254

>>11606236

Which should narrow it down. I think the loliposters are from places where loli is legal and the ones actually posting CP are likely well-outside any jurisdiction that would v& them.

 

>>11606240

Interesting take. Halfchan is full of shills using memeflags. Those are quite obviously VPN's.

I'd love to doxx these jerks.

Anonymous ID: 944147 Nov. 12, 2020, 1:25 a.m. No.11606262   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6291

>>11606254

Interesting. At the risk of applying /pol/ stereotypes, a Canadian location would likely indicate Chinese operatives to me.

I'm no tech expert. Do you mean that you narrowed down their physical locations to Canada or just Canadian IP's?

Anonymous ID: 944147 Nov. 12, 2020, 1:33 a.m. No.11606304   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6317

>>11606295

I consider my phone to be a weapon against the deep state and I haven't upgraded or replaced it because I have too much useful shit saved and fully intend to chuck this thing into the fucking trench when I'm done with this Digital War.