>>11608514

Scott Adams went through a great logical analogy yesterday.

1. motive

2. opportunity

3. capability

4. the will to act

If you apply those 4 things to the question of "was the voting hacked", the answer is a clear 99% certainty.

1. Dems and Chinese have more motive than anyone on the planet. Overwhelming motive because they think Trump is Satan or he is going to ruin everything they've built.

1. Clearly the software was so compromised, along with analog mail-in fuckery, that opportunity was everywhere.

1. Hacks are obviously technically possible, given what CM is showing. Given the billions of dollars available, the Dems or Chinese are way more than capable of executing this kind of cheating.

1. All that is needed is a few of the right people with low enough morals to say "fuck yeah, we'll do it, sign me up." How many millions of fuckheads do the Dems have on their side willing to do it? Tons.

>>11608604

I'm not trying to prove a legal case, I'm merely describing human nature. Mathematically the chance would be astronomically high that cheating occurred, given those 4 basic conditions and the millions of potential people involved.

Was it done equally by both sides, or has it been done in every election, or was the occurrence enough to matter, those are other questions.

>>11608680

With all the new platforms, has anyone found a good one that is censor-free and doesn't need an account sign-up?

Feels like most of the channels are taking a 'shotgun' approach and putting a feed on every platform they can find.

>>11608767

KEK