Anonymous ID: 1a250e Nov. 12, 2020, 10:39 a.m. No.11611396   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1559 >>1589

>>11611330

I would agree with you for the language I'd prefer

for a young lady to use NORMALLY. Please be

aware of both who she's speaking FOR, and who

she's speaking TO. We need everybody. She's

just translating to a dialect of english the low-

lifes will understand.

Anonymous ID: 1a250e Nov. 12, 2020, 10:43 a.m. No.11611454   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11611312

A well-thought-out hypothesis, anon. Yours personally,

or are you quoting a source? Would love to have

that if true. In the meme-time, I'm stealing this!

Anonymous ID: 1a250e Nov. 12, 2020, 10:50 a.m. No.11611563   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1837

>>11611412

I still do not feel this way about ALL FOX News

broadcasters, anon. And, since Fox was owned

by Rupert Murdoch, we all should have known

that it couldn't remain unsodden forever.

Anonymous ID: 1a250e Nov. 12, 2020, 10:55 a.m. No.11611625   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11611317

I understand this 'free-speech' angle completely, anon.

Your post is gracious, and elegantly stated. However,

there is no place on this or any other website

that grants free-speech statust to underage

child pornographic images that I've been

seeing on some threads. YOU CANNOT DEFEND

THEM WITH 'FREE SPEECH' CLAIMS. THEY

ARE PATENTLY ILLEGAL AND MUST BE

REPORTED. And allowing them could shut this

whole worthy cause down.

Anonymous ID: 1a250e Nov. 12, 2020, 11:02 a.m. No.11611732   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11611328

Would make sense for Trump team covering their

tracks on election machine fraud investigations,

anon. Your posts are always helpful and fascinating.

Thank you very much, friend.