Anonymous ID: 926f40 Nov. 12, 2020, 10:37 a.m. No.11611381   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1394

>>11611359

All that hurts my head. Let's just stick with the simplest solutionโ€ฆโ€ฆexpose these traitors for the obvious fraud they tried pulling, eliminate all those extraneous ballots, and declare Trump the overwhelming winner he rightfully is.

Anonymous ID: 926f40 Nov. 12, 2020, 11:05 a.m. No.11611773   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1803 >>1815 >>1841 >>1873 >>1880 >>1925

>>11611697

To me, it's always a big red flag when people work extra hard to convince you not to look at someone, due to them being a "LARP". It's like the dems calling all their enemies "racists". It's just too easy. The MSM does it all the time by labeling information contrary to their narrative as "conspiracy theory".

 

In regard to E - he's been banned on Twitter multiple times in the past few days. Someone doesn't want people to see what he says. That raises a huge red flag for me, and makes me want to see what it is they're saying. And when people here keep shilling the breads over what a LARP he is, it also raises a red flag for me.

Anonymous ID: 926f40 Nov. 12, 2020, 11:14 a.m. No.11611898   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2044

>>11611841

I've been here since he came around, and I'll admit he's had some major LARPY moments. But there's been LARPY moments for a lot of people that are still held in high regard around here. Who the hell has been right 100% of the time? Who the hell hasn't given disinformation? Maybe E is a LARP, but why would someone work that hard at being a LARP. What's in it for him?