After sunshine shift anon posted Q quote about the Dems and China today on dayshift comments were posted by Pirate-anons. Here they are translated from Pirate:

Watch the 9 dash line. The 7th Fleet watches the waters. Make Ready.

Did you think that the 9 dash line and related 'peace through strength' gains and our current position of ascendance would be stolen?

Trust the plan. Watch the waters.

Enemies both foreign and domestic. They have now been activated. Observe

Transit through the straights demonstrates a resolve to open and free usage and it is unwise to think or act otherwise.

Hope you are watching shipmates. No more shouts from the crow's nest!

▶

>>11615529

The Pirates pointed to the line of demarcation of chinese power.

Anon posted: Q: "[D] leadership in joint ops w/ China [CCP] in effort to regain power?"

Pirates replied.

"ch*na playing rough and bully over there eh?

why?

When ch*na acts crazy, what is America's move?

Gold and T?

ch na shows force but what would their economy be w/o America?

like dem leaders cheating elections, there was no choice?

cheat or lose and exposed

why do they want biden in?

perhaps ch na along the same track?

attack or lose and exposed"

Anon wrote: If I'm following along we may see China or Taiwan or the Spratly Islands in the news soon.

China, like the Dems, must continue on the script they were provided. Both have followed plans that were independent of fact on the ground. Who is pulling the strings?

China, like the Dems, does not have a choice. Someone has very strong leverage over both. If they fail to execute they will be exposed.

>>11615597

Noticed Pirate comms, anons, arrr! Pirates suggesting happenings around the 9 dash/dotted line. These Pirates posted:

>>11606992 pb

ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR All Hands. Ready?

Taiwan……….Due To Ch*na Perceived Possibilities; The Successful Peace Through Strength Doctrine Is Now Being Tested..

Watching The Waters? WWG1WGA. PRAY. Its On.

Arrr Hope ye be watching shipmates. No more shouts from the crow's nest!

transit through the straights demonstrates a resolve to open and free usage and it is unwise to think or act otherwise Arr!

We See Ye Shipmate! Arrr!

ch*na playing rough and bully over there eh?

why?

When ch*na acts crazy, what is America's move?

Gold and T?

ch na shows force but what would their economy be w/o America?

why do they want biden in?

like dem leaders cheating elections, there was no choice?

cheat or lose and exposed

perhaps ch na along the same track?

attack or lose and exposed

ch na already attacked w covid, imo

Many counters to counters.

i suppose the smartest ideas win

>>11615736

Kansas:

The PRC has no legal grounds to unilaterally impose its will on the region. Beijing has offered no coherent legal basis for its “Nine-Dashed Line” claim in the South China Sea since formally announcing it in 2009. In a unanimous decision on July 12, 2016, an Arbitral Tribunal constituted under the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention – to which the PRC is a state party – rejected the PRC’s maritime claims as having no basis in international law. The Tribunal sided squarely with the Philippines, which brought the arbitration case, on almost all claims.

As the United States has previously stated, and as specifically provided in the Convention, the Arbitral Tribunal’s decision is final and legally binding on both parties. Today we are aligning the U.S. position on the PRC’s maritime claims in the SCS with the Tribunal’s decision. Specifically:

The PRC cannot lawfully assert a maritime claim – including any Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) claims derived from Scarborough Reef and the Spratly Islands – vis-a-vis the Philippines in areas that the Tribunal found to be in the Philippines’ EEZ or on its continental shelf. Beijing’s harassment of Philippine fisheries and offshore energy development within those areas is unlawful, as are any unilateral PRC actions to exploit those resources. In line with the Tribunal’s legally binding decision, the PRC has no lawful territorial or maritime claim to Mischief Reef or Second Thomas Shoal, both of which fall fully under the Philippines’ sovereign rights and jurisdiction, nor does Beijing have any territorial or maritime claims generated from these features.

As Beijing has failed to put forth a lawful, coherent maritime claim in the South China Sea, the United States rejects any PRC claim to waters beyond a 12-nautical mile territorial sea derived from islands it claims in the Spratly Islands (without prejudice to other states’ sovereignty claims over such islands). As such, the United States rejects any PRC maritime claim in the waters surrounding Vanguard Bank (off Vietnam), Luconia Shoals (off Malaysia), waters in Brunei’s EEZ, and Natuna Besar (off Indonesia). Any PRC action to harass other states’ fishing or hydrocarbon development in these waters – or to carry out such activities unilaterally – is unlawful.

The PRC has no lawful territorial or maritime claim to (or derived from) James Shoal, an entirely submerged feature only 50 nautical miles from Malaysia and some 1,000 nautical miles from China’s coast. James Shoal is often cited in PRC propaganda as the “southernmost territory of China.” International law is clear: An underwater feature like James Shoal cannot be claimed by any state and is incapable of generating maritime zones. James Shoal (roughly 20 meters below the surface) is not and never was PRC territory, nor can Beijing assert any lawful maritime rights from it.

https://www.state.gov/u-s-position-on-maritime-claims-in-the-south-china-sea/

>>11615842

>If I'm following along we may see China or Taiwan or the Spratly Islands in the news soon.

China, like the Dems, must continue on the script they were provided. Both have followed plans that were independent of fact on the ground. Who is pulling the strings?

China, like the Dems, does not have a choice. Someone has very strong leverage over both. If they fail to execute they will be exposed.

Remember: what happens here will happen in Asia:

Nov 5 2017 02:17:24 (EST)

What happened in SA will happen here, Asia, and EU.

Q Team will keep us informed. Trust the (global) plan.

>>11615896

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 2a9c6e No.9778683 📁

Jun 28 2020 14:56:10 (EST)

A person(s) value:

1. vote

2. monetary value (tax contribution)

Why is 'free thought' ridiculed, challenged, and threatened when a person is opposed to the 'mainstream-narrative'?

[2] remains fixed (degree allowable by 'economic recession/expansion')

[1] remains a variable

[1] dependent on a 'controlled' system of information dissemination

What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?

What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?

What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?

What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?

What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?

What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?

Fact becomes fiction?

Fiction becomes fact?

When does news become propaganda?

Identity creation?

How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?

Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?

Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?

‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].

[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]

Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?

Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?

Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?

Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?

Threat to intellectual freedom?

Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?

Read again – digest.

Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?

THINK BLM PUSH EVERY 4-YEARS.

Logical thinking.

Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other ‘ism’?

How much of the population still believes POTUS colluded w/ RUSSIA due to MSDNC 365-blitz?

No MSDNC retraction of POTUS_RUSSIA collusion narrative [propaganda]? _why?

Pre/post 2016 election?

Why were[are] violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded and allowed to operate within [D] controlled cities [safe-zones]?

Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?

Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?

Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]?

When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.

Control of the narrative = power

When you are blind, what do you see?

They want you divided.

Divided by religion.

Divided by race.

Divided by sex.

Divided by political affiliation.

Divided by class.

When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers].

Divided you are weak.

Divided you pose no threat to their control.

When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep].

When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.

"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.

THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Q

>>11616031

Didn't Q tell us of global developments all along, Anon? Did Q call it 'The American Awakening" or 'The Great Awakening"? The Plan is worldwide. Restoring the United States of America is one stage of that plan. I too, hope that stage is resolved very soon, but I wanted to remind you of the scope of 'The Plan'. Imagine having that as your job and people getting impatient with you.

Does anyone remember? Please, if you are relatively new to Q and are thinking locally spend 10 minutes researching this. It will be worth your while to appreciate where we are now in 'The Plan'. This is about saving humanity

https://qanon.pub/?q=humanity

Keep faith in Humanity.

Keep faith in Yourself.

Light of the World.

Q

Anonymous ID: cS8cMPVQ No.148033178 📁

Nov 5 2017 02:17:24 (EST)

What happened in SA will happen here, Asia, and EU.

>>11616066

This is from Q+, Anon. Hang in there. Anons know.

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.373 📁

Oct 9 2018 20:42:13 (EST)

Statement release 10.9.18 [p_AUTHORITY1]

General Statement:

We understand that there is extreme fatigue and frustration re: the wheels of justice [slow].

Exclude emotion and personal desire, instead use logic and critical thinking based on situational awareness [undo a lifetime of evil & corruption [infestation] in the span of less than 2 years w/ a corrupt DOJ & FBI in place?].

[Process & Planning – Law and Order]

[Military OP]

How can you make arrests [non military] prior to first fully cleaning out corrupt elements [at the top] of those departments [FBI][DOJ] that oversee ‘investigation & prosecution’ in the United States [they [themselves] are the very ones engaged in the illegal treasonous acts]?

James Comey, Director – FIRED

Andrew McCabe, Deputy Director - FIRED

Jim Rybicki, Chief of Staff and Senior Counselor – FIRED

James Baker, General Counsel – FIRED

Bill Priestap, Director of Counterintelligence (Strzok’s boss) – Cooperating witness [power removed]

Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence – FIRED

Lisa Page, Office of General Counsel – FIRED/FORCED

Mike Kortan, Assistant Director for Public Affairs – FIRED

Josh Campbell, Special Assistant to Comey – FIRED

David Laufman, Chief of the Justice Department’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section [NAT SEC - HRC email invest] - FIRED/FORCE

John Carlin, Assistant Attorney General – Head of DOJ’s National Security Division - FIRED/FORCED

Sally Yates, Deputy Attorney General & Acting Attorney General - FIRED

Mary McCord, Acting Assistant Attorney General – Acting Head of DOJ’s National Security Division - FIRED/FORCED

Bruce Ohr, Associate Deputy Attorney General – Demoted 2x - cooperating witness [power removed] - TERMINATION IMMINENT

Rachel Brand, Associate Attorney General – No. 3 official behind Deputy AG Rosenstein - FIRED/FORCED

[Batter’s Box]

Michael Steinbach

John Glacalone

Randy Coleman

Trisha Anderson

https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/09/fashion/weddings/trisha-anderson-charles-newman-weddings.html📁

Kevin Clinesmith

Tashina Gauhar

Sally Moyer

How do you ensure those prosecuted [non military] would receive an impartial judgement based on the RULE OF LAW?

Think Federal Judge rulings [obstruction] [POTUS’ granted CONSTITUTIONAL authority].

How do you ensure 'appeals' to the U.S. Supreme Court are evaluated impartially based on the RULE OF LAW?

Think Justice K (5 to 4).

Military Law v Criminal Law

“Enemy Combatant”