>>11587675

>Been thinking about Trump's nickname for joe Biden - sleepy joe.

>It was an odd one. Crooked kind of makes sense, for HRC, and conjures up images of Witches and Crooks. But sleepy?

>There are a million other pejoratives that would have been more effective. For instance, Creepy joe. Gropey joe. Sniffy joe. Take your pick.

>But "sleepy" joe? Everyone gets tired and sleepy, especially older people. It doesn't quite have that image or that edge. So why did he choose this particular nickname for him?

>It hit me a couple days ago.

>Someone who is sleepy will inevitably "fall asleep" at some point.

>”Fall asleep" is also a euphemism for dying.

>joe's role is to "fall asleep" so he can be replaced, and Trump has been signalling this for the longest time.

Well fu— would they 187 the old pedo and try to pin it on a patriot?

Anyone know if creepy parler ever changed its TOS so users aren't shafted for "any legal costs that Parler incurs because of their posts."

Pretty sure that sticking their users for Parler's problems isn't "messy" …. that's closer to extortion. Also, why was Bongino ok with that oppressive TOS inclusion?

Fortune

Conservative social media darling Parler discovers that free speech is messy

By Danielle Abril

July 1, 2020 1:00 PM MDT

"Although growing quickly, Parler isn't much of a business. It survives mostly from the undisclosed amount of money it raised from private investors including conservative commentator Dan Bongino. Recently, the company started testing ads on its service, but it doesn’t make much cash from them.

"In the meantime, Matze said he plans to tweak some of his site's rules that some critics have said are anti-free speech. For example, he promised to adjust language in the site's terms of service that put users on the hook for any legal costs that Parler incurs because of their posts."

https://archive.is/pCEpo

>>11616821

Can't be any other way with the left being a blinded cult.