The Last of the Mohicans Main Theme (Official Music Video) - Tina Guo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htd_DLRZDCs
I could be being used to spread disinfo, anons. Make of it what you will. I work sunshine/early shift. I interacted with some Pirates. Here's what I translated from Pirate:
Watch the 9 dash line. The 7th Fleet watches the waters. Make Ready.
Did you think that the 9 dash line and related 'peace through strength' gains and our current position of ascendance would be stolen?
Trust the plan. Watch the waters.
Enemies both foreign and domestic. They have now been activated. Observe
Transit through the straights demonstrates a resolve to open and free usage and it is unwise to think or act otherwise.
Hope you are watching shipmates. No more shouts from the crow's nest!
Anons - attached is a graphic of the 9 dash line
Kansas:
https://www.state.gov/u-s-position-on-maritime-claims-in-the-south-china-sea/
The PRC has no legal grounds to unilaterally impose its will on the region. Beijing has offered no coherent legal basis for its “Nine-Dashed Line” claim in the South China Sea since formally announcing it in 2009. In a unanimous decision on July 12, 2016, an Arbitral Tribunal constituted under the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention – to which the PRC is a state party – rejected the PRC’s maritime claims as having no basis in international law. The Tribunal sided squarely with the Philippines, which brought the arbitration case, on almost all claims.
As the United States has previously stated, and as specifically provided in the Convention, the Arbitral Tribunal’s decision is final and legally binding on both parties. Today we are aligning the U.S. position on the PRC’s maritime claims in the SCS with the Tribunal’s decision. Specifically:
The PRC cannot lawfully assert a maritime claim – including any Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) claims derived from Scarborough Reef and the Spratly Islands – vis-a-vis the Philippines in areas that the Tribunal found to be in the Philippines’ EEZ or on its continental shelf. Beijing’s harassment of Philippine fisheries and offshore energy development within those areas is unlawful, as are any unilateral PRC actions to exploit those resources. In line with the Tribunal’s legally binding decision, the PRC has no lawful territorial or maritime claim to Mischief Reef or Second Thomas Shoal, both of which fall fully under the Philippines’ sovereign rights and jurisdiction, nor does Beijing have any territorial or maritime claims generated from these features.
As Beijing has failed to put forth a lawful, coherent maritime claim in the South China Sea, the United States rejects any PRC claim to waters beyond a 12-nautical mile territorial sea derived from islands it claims in the Spratly Islands (without prejudice to other states’ sovereignty claims over such islands). As such, the United States rejects any PRC maritime claim in the waters surrounding Vanguard Bank (off Vietnam), Luconia Shoals (off Malaysia), waters in Brunei’s EEZ, and Natuna Besar (off Indonesia). Any PRC action to harass other states’ fishing or hydrocarbon development in these waters – or to carry out such activities unilaterally – is unlawful.
The PRC has no lawful territorial or maritime claim to (or derived from) James Shoal, an entirely submerged feature only 50 nautical miles from Malaysia and some 1,000 nautical miles from China’s coast. James Shoal is often cited in PRC propaganda as the “southernmost territory of China.” International law is clear: An underwater feature like James Shoal cannot be claimed by any state and is incapable of generating maritime zones. James Shoal (roughly 20 meters below the surface) is not and never was PRC territory, nor can Beijing assert any lawful maritime rights from it.
The world will not allow Beijing to treat the South China Sea as its maritime empire. America stands with our Southeast Asian allies and partners in protecting their sovereign rights to offshore resources, consistent with their rights and obligations under international law. We stand with the international community in defense of freedom of the seas and respect for sovereignty and reject any push to impose “might makes right” in the South China Sea or the wider region.
Here's an interesting portion of the exchange. Anon posted:
Q: "[D] leadership in joint ops w/ China [CCP] in effort to regain power?"
Pirates replied:
"ch*na playing rough and bully over there eh?
why?
When ch*na acts crazy, what is America's move?
Gold and T?
ch na shows force but what would their economy be w/o America?
like dem leaders cheating elections, there was no choice?
cheat or lose and exposed
why do they want biden in?
perhaps ch na along the same track?
attack or lose and exposed"
Pirate comms 11/12:
Noticing Pirate comms, anons, arrr! Pirates suggesting happenings around the 9 dotted line:
ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR All Hands. Ready?
Taiwan……….Due To Ch*na Perceived Possibilities; The Successful Peace Through Strength Doctrine Is Now Being Tested..
Watching The Waters? WWG1WGA. PRAY. Its On.
Arrr Hope ye be watching shipmates. No more shouts from the crow's nest!
transit through the straights demonstrates a resolve to open and free usage and it is unwise to think or act otherwise Arr!
We See Ye Shipmate! Arrr!
ch*na playing rough and bully over there eh?
why?
When ch*na acts crazy, what is America's move?
Gold and T?
ch na shows force but what would their economy be w/o America?
why do they want biden in?
like dem leaders cheating elections, there was no choice?
cheat or lose and exposed
perhaps ch na along the same track?
attack or lose and exposed
ch na already attacked w covid, imo
Many counters to counters.
i suppose the smartest ideas win
This anon had posted Q: "[D] leadership in joint ops w/ China [CCP] in effort to regain power?"
Pirates took notice. Their Pompeo responses were instructive. Again, they could be using me. Q did say Mil Intel would steer us. Let's watch the South China Sea for a bit, shall we?
I'm not sure of that, Anon. Other posts in the 'Pirate exchange' I had today led me to conclude China is comped and has no choice but to play a role. Of course it made me think of 'You are watching a movie'. The post suggested that in the US the Dems are being forced to play a role upon threat of exposure. China is in the same predicament. Again, someone could be leading me to either a true or false assertion. I just wanted to put it on the board.
We need boatfags and shipping fags on this. This anon lacks expertise but knows enough to humbly seek it.
Check it out, Anon. We once got a Q post where Q replied to a questioning anon:
Busy saving humanity
Q
https://qanon.pub/?q=humanity
Do you really grasp what is happening here?