>>11620844 (pb)
Only a constitutional convention may change the constitution when it comes to matters concerning 1 of the 3 branches of government.
Legislation can only add shit like Alcohol Prohibition, but they can not change the fundamentals of the constituion.
Why do you think they have not been able to change the 2nd amendment...legislation can be carried to SCOTUS and wiped out because of the constitutional precedences.
Check for yourself how they had to change the constitution after FDR.
…without understanding it.
Do you know what 'Ratified by the states' means?
The amendment was passed by Congress in 1947, and was ratified by the states on 27 February 1951.
You can see the difference there, yes?
Congress passed it, but HAD to be approved by who?
Bring the evil bastards down Q and Q+
That date didn't exist then.
Who had to approve it?
You won't answer that, but it was the STATES!
The same fucking process as a consitutional convention.
Piss off, you fool!
You still don't get it.
Ratification has to be done by the states.
What happens with a constitutinal convention?
THE EXACT SAME FUCKING THING!
Approval of the state!
Secondly!
Congress APPROVED IT!
Could not institute it as a law on their own!
APPROVAL OF STATES…SAME FUCKING THING as a constitutinal convention.
You asshat, don't understand shit about law!
'states didn't have to ratify it', what a fucking stupid excuse to see that YOU don't undestand shit.
Get off your fuck weed!