Anonymous ID: 55e754 Nov. 12, 2020, 9:25 p.m. No.11621224   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1280

>>11621084

That has absolutely nothing to do with what you claimed. You're so stupid you don't even know

what you said yourself.

>Only a constitutional convention may change the constitution when it comes to matters concerning 1 of the 3 branches of government.

Which is nonsense. Article V has nothing to do with which branch an Amendment concerns.

Either Congress OR a Constitutional convention can change the Constituiton. A

CC is NOT required for ratification if Congress

passes an Amendment. They don'thave to meet, just vote.

Anonymous ID: 55e754 Nov. 12, 2020, 9:36 p.m. No.11621436   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1497

>>11621334

 

>What happens with a constitutinal convention?

They meet to decide on whether or not to create new Amendments.

 

>THE EXACT SAME FUCKING THING!

Not even close. They don't meet to vote on Congressionally proposed Amendments. They

just vote on them.

Anonymous ID: 55e754 Nov. 12, 2020, 9:41 p.m. No.11621497   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11621436

And a convention has NEVER been used. So clearly that other process isn't a CC. Nor does

it have anything to do with which branch of the government it involves, which was really the

stupidest part of your stupid comment.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_to_propose_amendments_to_the_United_States_Constitution