>>11608681 (p/b)

>States v Federal in regard to elections.

>I dropped this last bread, but it didn't seem to get any eyes on.

Thanks for dropping it in the bread. I intend to read the whole thing.

Based on personal experience and observations while providing evidence of voter and election fraud...

Some things referred for prosecution do fall pretty much only under jurisdiction of state.

Those of us gathering evidence need to gather enough evidence in a way that can also invoke federal jurisdiction, because in the corrupt states like mine, taking evidence of state election law violations is a waste of time. My personal fear is that nothing would come of it, and the corrupt would turn their focus on me and invent crimes.

There are two phases to investigations, COVERT and OVERT. The manual on page 21 talks about overt, and skips over covert. This page also mentions overt.

I can tell you that the covert phase is going on in my state. This is the phase where people like me are turning over physical evidence and it is being analyzed to either proceed with the overt phase after the election is certified, or to prosecute people like me if we like, fabricate/alter records, mislead, etc. (It is intimidating to know that corrupt people in DOJ could be making the case against me to protect the corrupt, instead of going after the corrupt. Therefore, copies of what has been reported have been disseminated to multiple places so they can't disappear the 302s.)

My impression has been they don't want the targets to know the covert phase exists, so the targets don't destroy evidence. I know I have been preserving evidence just in case the targets destroy it.

Once the overt phase starts, records from various gov't entities involved (ranging from secretary of state down to local county election offices) will be examined to corroborate evidence submitted during the covert phase. By preserving evidence, if they destroy/alter evidence....

Every time I uncover something, I list the statutes violated, as many as I can think of (state and federal).

I suspect at least one top level target in my state is getting nervous based on a public comment. One of those comments that I file under the "public denials is actually confirmation" category.