predictions of Q are rarely correct.
just start reading it from the start and ignore
'the clock'
not saying that the clock isn't real, clearly it's a thing. But only some people are able to understand what it is trying to suggest.
and often, too often, it's used as a slide.
let me rephrase:
predictions of (when) Q (will post) are rarely correct.
Predictions that Q makes: I'm on board with taking them very very seriously.
see:
and when saying 'predictions that Q makes . . . ' it could easily be modified to 'what Q posts I take seriously' if you need precision.
'you clowns'
you probably already read that I changed my post as follows:
predictions of (when) Q (will post) are rarely correct.
and
if Q says something, I listen and try to ascertain the meaning and do not dismiss it.
you wasted so much indignation on me for no reason, anon.
That . . . was indignation that could have been used on a Marxist . . . .
boo hoo hooo
why do shills rule the morning breads . . . .
if so then why wouldn't you publish a calander in PDF format and post it to the bread?
you boast brag this predictive ability but provide no sauce.
the idea that a chemical that the mind produces itself makes on crazy enough for someone else to say 'this is a defective person' and then cage you . . . is a fallacy.
nor is it true that the effect of that kind of overdose always makes someone too susceptible, in fact some just retreat into their inner cave and subvert back into the ground of eternity, trusting that
in the morning
everything's going to be alright.
and wake up from the freak out and no one is the wiser for there transformative ego-burning. (except of course, for them)
the voting system worked perfectly.
the counting system is compromised.
they know it is the counting part that is broken.
everyone was let to vote.
the counting is done incorrectly on purpose to favor Biden and democratic-marxists.
still going on with it?
i did not say ' predictions that Q makes'
I said 'predictions of Q' which I didn't include implied I mean (and did mean) predictions of when Q posts.
and you know this or you don't but you keep badgering? or you didn't read the further posts?
it's interesting how quick the villianization proceeds and then turns into a pack of wolves, none of it is organic.
and all of it is hatchet people with the long knifes drawn.
and the stab at the curtain of someone else behind the spit screan of the internet and take out their frustrations on a stranger. And everyone can 'go there' from time to time. I choose to not go there anymore forever. (but understand that is not easy to do)
The vote, and the voting was safe, secure, warm and friendly.
but what we have is a case of
TALLY TAMPERERS
Tally tampering is the real story today.
the vote was warm and kind to ease the mind.
but the count was a devious deception.
there were two nodes of uClinux, which is part of the kernel in 3.6 so it's not a fork anymore. Then two that were on an android backplane, probably so they could just use a cellphone type device.
the real design and data flow diagrams didn't seem available in the stuff I saw.
but my question for those who think they got away with something: do you know how to use journalctl?
cause if you don't ? you're probably in for some disclosure briefings about what is known from the datalogs, and from the router logs.
but I don't know, I can only guess.