>>11627994

>>11627996

>is it possible to generate a false positive if you simply run enough cycles?

This question comes from the guy who wants to implant chips in our heads to connect with his 5G satellite network.

He knows the answer. The point is, what is his purpose in asking the question?

Does he want to be seen as 'trustworthy' so his transhumanist technology will be embraced?

>>11628400

>At what point does it become mathematically impossible???

Checked.

>>11628391

Those screenshots illustrate the Epoch Times is countering CNN disinfo with truth.

Campaign dropped its lawsuit because the state GOP filed its own.

>>11628354

been notabled several times

four days old news from ZH

RT had it on Tuesday

>>11628413

what is most worth noting is the last gasps of DB which has been exposed in the FinCen files as a participant in trillions of dollars of illegal transactions

>>11628441

BS.

DOJ inaction has been going on far longer than 10 days.

>>11628460

>>11628528

Moot.

Barr's memo from Tuesday is what you should be looking at.

The memo was screenshot and notabled on Tuesday.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/525402-barr-sparks-doj-firestorm-with-election-probe

>>11628593