Anonymous ID: cc3da3 Nov. 13, 2020, 9:53 a.m. No.11628183   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11627996

Uh, do a little digging nigger.

  1. Unknown, likely unpublished.

  2. Yes, it's man made and utilized, so there must be false positives.

The Q is, is the p-value closer to catastrophic failures in Tesla's or the normal between 5 and 6 sigma. I'm guessing lack of official data gives us the former.

Anonymous ID: cc3da3 Nov. 13, 2020, 10:11 a.m. No.11628401   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11628071

>Why not unsigned int.

Possible lazy ass coders.

If they are doing maths on these numbers, your Calc Object would have to convert it to double first to avoid possible exception error crash.

Or the database the raw number goes into is double, same story though.

Good code and data tables keep data entered as what it is. It's a cheap and effective check on entered data.

Exception:

Count = int(input)

If exception = fatal.exception.not.int

Then:

Some way to get voter to clarify.

I wouldn't store as double. Wouldn't data table as double

Seems someone doesn't care if votes entered are unsigned int.****

Anonymous ID: cc3da3 Nov. 13, 2020, 10:35 a.m. No.11628711   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11628337

I understand the PCR point very well.

My post simply pointed out that Human test always generate false data, this is a binary result, so must have false positive. The p-value matters. It's unpublished. Thus likely false results are high and known to CDC.