Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 14, 2020, 10:09 p.m. No.11652108   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2141

The Greek behind the electronic voting system in Canada and the US

 

John Poulos is the founding President and CEO of Dominion Voting, a company focused on improving the electoral process through the application of technology.

 

Dominion is now in about 150 municipalities and was used in a couple of province-wide elections, including most polling stations in Ontarioโ€™s 2010 election. Dominion also has technology in 1,000 United States counties across 35 states.

 

Poulos has grown the company through direct support to elections in Mongolia and the Philippines.

His company now offers a full suite of technology-enabled equipment and services for all aspects of election, from compiling lists of eligible voters and recording when they voted, to counting votes and polling stations, toremote voting technologies that take the booth to the voter.

 

Identifying thatautomated voting technologycould enable disenfranchised voters a transparent say in their own destiny, he co-founded the Delian Project, a non-profit organization that aims to help post-conflict and emerging democracies implement positive change in their electoral process through the application of technology.

 

He was selected as one of Canadaโ€™s Top 40 under 40 in 2010. His company has also been named to Deloitte Canadaโ€™s Fast 50 Technology Companies for four consecutive years. He was awarded the Queenโ€™s Diamond Jubilee Award in 2013 for his philanthropic work, and was recognized as Greek Americaโ€™s 40 under 40.

 

John Poulos holds a Bachelorโ€™s degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Toronto, and a Masterโ€™s of Business Administration from INSEAD.

 

He is a youth hockey coach and a mentor to young aspiring business students. He is an active member of YPO, and part of an alliance of Greek-Canadian entrepreneurs who share a common goal to preserve their heritage.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 14, 2020, 10:10 p.m. No.11652113   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2128 >>2294 >>2638

JIDF/Mossad(Jewish Internet Defense Force, yes it's a real thing, even though it sounds utterly moronic).

(I didn't believe it at first either.)

 

JIDF/MOSSAD BAKERSwill be the ones that never include any derogatory information regarding Jews, or Israel in the Notables or claim "it's not all'' the jews" ''

 

Notice they will defend the jew no matter the accusation yet provideZEROevidence refuting any claim.

These are the only idiots that demand you use the filter, they can't argue the facts so they insist that you filter anything that they don't want you to learn. Easy to spot after a few breads, they always use "muh-joo, muh-jew, muhjewshill, muh all jews, jewh8, jew hater, CHYNESE, Chyna, CCP Shill" or any variant thereof. (((They))) are LITERALLY THE ONLY ONES that use these terms. They have even gone so far as to call Q a muhjoo. No other "ethnicity" has a force here blindly defending them the way (((They))) (the jews) do. A few of their gimmicks are to call it "24/7 copy pasta" or call the anon a "skinhead" or "fake skinhead" or now they are saying "Messianic Jews believe that Jesus is the Jewish messiah and God the Son" when all you need to do is read the Bible to see what Jesus said about the jews, or read the Talmud to see what jews say about Jesus, once again not arguing the validity of the information, just trying to distract you from it.

They especially love blaming muslims.

They are also the ones constantly attacking the board with ddos bullshit and flood the board with cartoon child porn, Gore, CP, and actual porn. Research the history of the jews use of pornography warfare.

They are the resident laughing stock and love calling anyone that posts jew truth an Iranian shill. But they are also all over the internet. YouTube live chats especially.

Now they just post pictures of moloch and say "yes, yes or good, good" before everything or call everyone else a disgusting nazi, kike, jew, or satanist. Or "It's not the jews it's the Satanists" Classic projection. But they still refuse to refute the information.

The jews also like to converse with each other in an attempt to fool the newfags into thinking they are actual patriot, non-jew, anons.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 14, 2020, 10:37 p.m. No.11652369   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2429

>>11652268

>NOTHING

>IS

>OWED

>TO

>YOU

Bullshit.

People in positions of authority take on a responsibility to the people they represent. This is the Social Contract. To say that "Nothing is owed to you" is a cop-out and defeatist attitude. Citizens work, pay taxes and expect something in return. When that contract is broken, it's the DUTY of the citizens to speak out about not being returned what is owed.

Don't pull that reverse-thinking Christian Bullshit, Anon. Thinking "Nothing is owed to us" is a psy-op built into Western Society. It wasn't like this when people had a mind to think.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 14, 2020, 10:48 p.m. No.11652490   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Anyone figured out if this chick is any relation to John Poulos from Dominion?

 

Lisbeth Poulos / Chief of Staff & Exec VP for in-Q-Tel

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/person/16672163

 

"People also search for"

  • Steve Owens / Staple Street (Dominion)

  • Danny O'Brien / Fox Corp

  • Timothy M Kenny / Judge for Michigan Circuit Court

  • Hootan Yaghhoobzadeh / Staple Street (Dominion, Carlyle)

  • Mark Weinstein / CEO Sgrouples Inc

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 14, 2020, 11:10 p.m. No.11652669   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2760

>>11652649

JIDF/Mossad(Jewish Internet Defense Force, yes it's a real thing, even though it sounds utterly moronic).

(I didn't believe it at first either.)

 

JIDF/MOSSAD BAKERSwill be the ones that never include any derogatory information regarding Jews, or Israel in the Notables or claim "it's not all'' the jews" ''

 

Notice they will defend the jew no matter the accusation yet provideZEROevidence refuting any claim.

These are the only idiots that demand you use the filter, they can't argue the facts so they insist that you filter anything that they don't want you to learn. Easy to spot after a few breads, they always use "muh-joo, muh-jew, muhjewshill, muh all jews, jewh8, jew hater, CHYNESE, Chyna, CCP Shill" or any variant thereof. (((They))) are LITERALLY THE ONLY ONES that use these terms. They have even gone so far as to call Q a muhjoo. No other "ethnicity" has a force here blindly defending them the way (((They))) (the jews) do. A few of their gimmicks are to call it "24/7 copy pasta" or call the anon a "skinhead" or "fake skinhead" or now they are saying "Messianic Jews believe that Jesus is the Jewish messiah and God the Son" when all you need to do is read the Bible to see what Jesus said about the jews, or read the Talmud to see what jews say about Jesus, once again not arguing the validity of the information, just trying to distract you from it.

They especially love blaming muslims.

They are also the ones constantly attacking the board with ddos bullshit and flood the board with cartoon child porn, Gore, CP, and actual porn. Research the history of the jews use of pornography warfare.

They are the resident laughing stock and love calling anyone that posts jew truth an Iranian shill. But they are also all over the internet. YouTube live chats especially.

Now they just post pictures of moloch and say "yes, yes or good, good" before everything or call everyone else a disgusting nazi, kike, jew, or satanist. Or "It's not the jews it's the Satanists" Classic projection. But they still refuse to refute the information.

The jews also like to converse with each other in an attempt to fool the newfags into thinking they are actual patriot, non-jew, anons.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Nov. 14, 2020, 11:15 p.m. No.11652704   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2770 >>2790

Brennan Center for Justice Letter to John A Poulos of Dominion Voting Systems

September 24, 2010

 

Dear Mr. Poulos:

 

We are pleased to enclose a copy of our latest publication, Voting System Failures: A

Database Solution. We hope that you will find it useful. This report reviewed hundreds of

reported instances of voting machine malfunctions and closely analyzed fourteen cases where

previously reported malfunctions reappeared in subsequent elections. In each of these

instances, a centralized database containing information of could have helped election

officials mitigate the problems of temporary or permanent miscount or loss of votes.

We recognize that advances in technology have reduced many of the errors that bring back

memories of the Florida 2000 election. However, headlines of failed voting machines,

frustrated voters and lost votes still remain a constant following every election cycle. The

reality is that with even the most sophisticated technologies, malfunctions still occur. Based

on conversations and interviews with election officials nationwide, our research indicates that

a database available to election officials would help them be better prepared to deal with a

malfunction.

While the creation of a national centralized database recommended in the report will take

time, vendors are in the unique position to significantly reduce the risk of repetition of past

problems with their systems in time for this fallโ€™s elections by voluntarily creating their own

databases. We would like to take this opportunity to encourage you to do so.

Our report notes that because there is such a high turnover among election officials, a new

county director might not be aware of product advisories or software patches sent by a voting

system vendor to her predecessor several years earlier. Nor is she likely to be aware of

problems reported by election officials in other counties. Those problems could have been

caused by poll worker error, a misuse or misprogramming of the system, or a host of other

reasons that are not related to a software or hardware malfunction โ€“ but that could still easily

be repeated in other counties in future elections.

A publicly available voluntary database along the lines we recommend would create for

election officials a central, easily accessible and searchable site where they could review all

previously issued product advisories, software patches and workaround, and a list of all

election official complaints, warranty claims and lawsuits about their systems. The database

should also contain the results of any vendor investigation, explanations, and actions taken to

address these complaints.

A voluntary database would provide election officials with an opportunity to be more fully

appraised of potential problems and safeguards that could be taken ahead of each election.

We would be delighted to discuss these recommendations with you and hope you will support

our efforts to improve the electoral process.

Respectfully,

 

Lawrence Norden

Senior Counsel, Democracy Program

 

https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/Democracy/letter%20to%20vendors%20-%20dominion.pdf