>Q post number =
>first digit = month, if October, then 10, then 1+0 = 1 November, 11, 1+1, 2, December 12, 1+2, 3. January = 1, etc.
>second, third, fourth digits, added together, and that = the day of the month.
October is 1. Maybe. It worked for the posts leading into 11.1
November is 2
December is 3
January? Don't know. Haven't tried. Might be 4?
And like post 243 for 11.7, the time/date stamp was for posts 121 which is directly specific for 11.7 too. But only found AFTER finding 243.
I've been well aware of and following Q posts since its inception too. And Ive seen many supposedly 'HAPPENING' moments too.
Countless times I've seen two or three posts link up in some way, 'proving' it happening.
I've seen endless number juggle flipping, gematra decoding, hidden cross mirrored meanings.
I've seen the in line mirrored 10-2 flip it over jiggle associations too. Some are a real stretch. And others, like the Q Clock I'm extremely impressed by.
I wouldn't even know where to begin with putting that together.
But what I have never see is being able to decode a specific date to get a bunch of posts, then those posts describe events that happen on very day, or even a series of jumbled scattered posts that come together across multiple days.
The reason was because the real world event had not happened. So we didnt have a base to start from. We couldn't tie it all together.
And because we couldn't solve the code, our decoding became more complex.
Now that the election has happened and the election fraud has been exposed we are able to make the correct association.
But how?
How was this done?
How was this possible?
Sure, even having complete and total control, thats a hell of a feat. Scattered posts spanning three years, coded in such a way to come together and tell specific details of event on that day.
And for these events to happen now and detailed in the posts, then every single event leading up to now would have to have been under complete control too. Everything!
I don't believe it was a trick, a great hoax or a lie? No. Lies have holes.
Is the solution as simple as the code? Is it right in front of us?
This is what I'm now seeking to understand and come to grips with.
I have to know.