Anonymous ID: bfa393 Nov. 15, 2020, 7:36 a.m. No.11655602   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5717

What if there was a way of finding the truth of anything, quickly and easily? No serious time wasting trying to vector in on the truth of a matter. What if there was a tool is available that will allow information to be verified or discarded rapidly. Any fact from history, the intentions of a person, literally any piece of information could be accessible.

This post may seem like a slide or some freakish BS but it’s serious and is intended to hand over a useful tool to weaponised autists to speed up the search for the truth in these dangerous times.

 

It has been shown over thousands of hours of testing that the human body/consciousness is able to detect falsehood. In the presence of a lie, certain muscles become weakened and this weakness is able to be measured. How this works is unknown but it’s been shown to be a repeatable, accurate and a reliable means of discerning truth from falsehood.

References:

‘Power Versus Force’ Dr David Hawkins 2002

‘Muscles Testing and Function’ Williams and Wilkins 1971

‘Your body Doesn’t Lie’ Dr Diamond 1979

 

Practical application:

It takes two people to conduct a quick test to determine if a statement is true or false.

  1. Person A stands with the right arm pointing to the floor and the left arm raised at 90 degrees parallel to the floor. Elbow straight

  2. Person B puts their left hand on the right shoulder of person A to steady them.

  3. Make the statement- ie ‘John Brennan is a traitor to people of the USA’ etc

  4. Person B pushes down firmly but gently on the left wrist of person A. But first telling person A to resist their arm being pushed down.

  5. If the arm is able to be pushed down without resistance- Statement is False

  6. If the arm resists the push down- The Statement is true

It takes a few tries to get the feel for it but I’ve found it works repeatedly.

To test this I printed off pictures of historical and current well known figures to see if we could determine the consciousness and honesty level of historical and current public figures. The reason being that their characters are generally well known to be either extremely positive or negative. The arbitrary calibration scale I’ve been using is described in ‘Power Versus Force’ by Dr David Hawkins.

Basically the main threshold level is that if someone has a consciousness level above 200 then they are honest, This appears to be the quick measure of being of good character. The scale is roughly shown below with my own take on it.

0-50 Very low conscious character – dishonest- mean-generally evil as fuck

50-100 Not as evil but still a piece of shit

100-200 Generally dishonest but not so evil. (Note David Hawkins states most of the human race is in this bracket)

200+ Anything above 200 indicates an honest character

600+ Highly honest and integrous

1000+ Enlightened- Highly evolved consciousness

 

The results I got are are shown below. To get these results I printed the pictures of the people, gave them random letter assignments and put them in a drawer in a separate room from the other person involved in the testing. They didn’t know who they were until after the test was complete. Not entirely double blind but I was only doing it out of curiosity.

During the test I’d make a statement such as ‘ the person in picture A has a consciousness level above 200’. If resistance was felt in the other persons arm, it indicated truth and we would continue up the scale until we got a false response and that determined the level they were at. Very roughly. If the arm was weak at this point we’d go down the scale until we got a solid resistance.

You can quickly see if this works for yourself. If it proves useful, it can be applied in this research. Also read the books referenced, you may think this is insane and so did I but now I think this is a valid research tool.

One note of caution

David Hawkins advises that it is required to ask if it is ethical to actually ask the question before you begin digging. Some information may not be beneficial