They hide in the shadows and op the way the do because it's all illegal

I can do this all day

Intimidation

Introduction

Under Indiana’s intimidation statute, an individual is prohibited from communicating with the intent to create fear of retaliation for a prior lawful act, or to force a person to engage in conduct against his or her will. Under the statute, the term “threat” is defined to include, among other things, an expression intended to “expose the person threatened to hatred, contempt, disgrace, or ridicule.” The State may be able to charge an individual with intimidation if the individual threatens to publish, or publishes, intimate photographs or videos of the victim without his or her consent as retaliation for a prior lawful act (e.g., ending a prior relationship) or forces the victim to engage in conduct against his or her will (e.g., continuing a relationship).

Text of Statute(s)

Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1 – Intimidation

All day long

I've been nice to this point putting it on demonrats because I love Q and Trump but we know it comes from all sides

Stalking Statutes in Indiana

State laws regarding stalking will differ depending on where you live. The chart below highlights some of Indiana’s anti-stalking statutes.

Code Section

35-45-10-1, et seq.

Stalking Defined as

Knowing or intentional conduct with repeated acts that would cause reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened or threatened and that actually causes such feelings.

Punishment/Classification

Class D felony. Class C felony if at least one of the following applies: (1) a person stalks and makes threat with intent to place victim in reasonable fear; or (2) court issued order to protect same victim(s) and perpetrator has actual notice of order; or (3) a criminal complaint of stalking pending in court and perpetrator has actual notice of complaint. Class B felony if: the act(s) were committed with deadly weapon or perpetrator has unrelated conviction for an offense against same victim(s)

Penalty for Repeat Offense

See Class C felony classification.

All day long

The EEO laws prohibit punishing job applicants or employees for asserting their rights to be free from employment discrimination including harassment. Asserting these EEO rights is called "protected activity," and it can take many forms. For example, it is unlawful to retaliate against applicants or employees for:

filing or being a witness in an EEO charge, complaint, investigation, or lawsuit

communicating with a supervisor or manager about employment discrimination, including harassment

answering questions during an employer investigation of alleged harassment

refusing to follow orders that would result in discrimination

resisting sexual advances, or intervening to protect others

requesting accommodation of a disability or for a religious practice

asking managers or co-workers about salary information to uncover potentially discriminatory wages.

Participating in a complaint process is protected from retaliation under all circumstances. Other acts to oppose discrimination are protected as long as the employee was acting on a reasonable belief that something in the workplace may violate EEO laws, even if he or she did not use legal terminology to describe it.

Engaging in EEO activity, however, does not shield an employee from all discipline or discharge. Employers are free to discipline or terminate workers if motivated by non-retaliatory and non-discriminatory reasons that would otherwise result in such consequences. However, an employer is not allowed to do anything in response to EEO activity that would discourage someone from resisting or complaining about future discrimination.

Phone computer sat receiver plus some things that would make you sound like a real but job

ALL DAY LONG

Malware is a general term used to describe a host of different types of software that infiltrate a computer without the explicit consent of the user. Deriving from the phrase “malicious software”, malware is ubiquitous in the modern age of computers. Studies suggest that the production of malware seems to have exceeded the rate at which legitimate software is proliferated.

Malware Issues

Although some forms of malware computer crime fall within the category of relatively benign pranks and annoyances, the prevalence of broadband internet has allowed for a burgeoning wave of malware solely intended to reap profits. Yet another form of malware is characteristically hostile, as it is used to destroy code and computational processes. Given the insipient problem of these types of software, online malware penalties are swiftly becoming a focus of lawmakers across the globe.

Types of Malware

There are various types of infectious programs that fall under the definition of malware. The most prevalent of these include spyware and bots, which allow an author to illicitly monitor user activity of the host system remotely.

Criminal Malware Penalties

Spybot data stealing penalties can range from incarceration to hefty fines, and are contingent upon the level of severity of the attack. In some cases, millions of credit and debit card data is stolen; this level of mayhem constitutes malware fraud felony, which can lead the perpetrators to serve numerous years in prison as well as pay enormous fines.

All day

Freedom advocate fighting for a lost cause and I'll still spill my own blood on these mountains

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. The RICO Act focuses specifically on racketeering and allows the leaders of a syndicate to be tried for the crimes they ordered others to do or assisted them in doing, closing a perceived loophole that allowed a person who instructed someone else to, for example, murder, to be exempt from the trial because they did not actually commit the crime personally. RICO was enacted by section 901 of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 and is codified at 18 U.S.C. ch. 96 as 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968. G. Robert Blakey, an adviser to the United States Senate Government Operations Committee, drafted the law under the close supervision of the committee's chairman, Senator John Little McClellan.