Anonymous ID: 65d65f Nov. 15, 2020, 9:54 a.m. No.11656829   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7033 >>7328

notablearticle posted LB: >>11656661 (PB)

 

Navigating a Contested Election, the Electoral Count Act and 12th Amendment: How to Ensure a Fully Counted Outcome

 

''Politics ought to be adjusted, not to human reasonings but to human nature, of which reason is but a part, and by no means the greatest part.'' โ€“ Edmund Burke

 

There are now many well documented threats to a free and fair election this year. Prominent among them are the danger that a seasonal spike of COVID-19 will coincide with the traditional flu cycle in October, overwhelming medical response capacity and adversely impacting in-person voting on November 3rd; the risk that deliberate changes to the postal service (currently ordered reversed by a federal court) will result in a tide of โ€œtoo late to be countedโ€ mail-in ballots; threats of cyber interruption to voter registration, voter validation, and ballot counts; and, most threatening of all, scenarios of presidential abuse of emergency and other executive powers to disrupt the vote or the count.

 

Commentators have spent considerable time understanding these threats, but we must also understand a potential process for recourse if the election is contested in particular ways. What follows is an analysis of some potential pathways. We note at the outset, however, that some of these paths may invoke questionable legal arguments (e.g., on the part of state-level Republican legislatures), and by entertaining such scenarios we do not give credence to those arguments. Instead, our goal is to show how some political actors might nevertheless try to assert these types of claims, and what recourse remains when they do.

 

The 12th Amendment to the Constitution, adopted in 1804, states the relevant law for the Electoral College โ€“ the process for selecting our President. Unfortunately, the wording of that amendment is confusing and, as a consequence, presents difficulties. Congress attempted to cure those difficulties in the Electoral Count Act of 1887. This one-hundred-and-thirty-three-year-old act has been roundly scorned by scholars as almost unintelligible. But that act is what will govern our process for determining who becomes President, if the result is contested in particular ways.

 

Letโ€™s play out some scenarios, focusing on four swing states: Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Michigan.

 

The Constitution assigns the election to the individual states to be conducted โ€œin such manner as the Legislature thereof shall direct.โ€ The electors appointed in these four states are to be drawn under state law from those representing the candidate winning the popular vote. Each of these states has set out a process designed to complete their tallies in order to avail themselves of the Electoral Count Actโ€™s โ€œsafe harborโ€ provision which contemplates that their electors will be counted by Congress if all disputes over those electors are resolved before that dateโ€”which this year is December 8. This seems straightforward enough, but thereโ€™s more than meets the eye.

โ€ฆ

Full article:

https://www.justsecurity.org/72700/navigating-a-contested-election-the-electoral-count-act-and-12th-amendment-how-to-ensure-a-fully-counted-outcome/

Anonymous ID: 65d65f Nov. 15, 2020, 10:07 a.m. No.11656975   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7339

>>11656761

> If this can of worms is properly opened,

Yup, nothing makes this a WW phenomenon more than full blown Election Fraud.

Indeed, there are some aspects of this PLAN and situation that ARE bigger than this anon had imagined.

''Oh my hubris.'' Oh the humanity!!

Anonymous ID: 65d65f Nov. 15, 2020, 10:20 a.m. No.11657139   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7170

>>11656871

notable

This connection was interesting LB:

 

>>11656233 (PB)

>>11656351 (PB)

>"Their relationship should have been easy to find, but it wasn't"

>>11656311 (PB)

>Senator Martha Mcsally and Dominion's COO Mark Mcsally are siblings.

Anonymous ID: 65d65f Nov. 15, 2020, 10:27 a.m. No.11657226   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11657170

>Dominion Diagnostics IS NOT Dominion Voting Technologies

Agreed. See:

>>11655374 (PB)

>Not seeing an immediate connection to the voting side.

>Their test is surely suspect though, and relevant, given the Elon Musk tweet about 50/50 negative/positive for 4 tests. VERY CONCERNING.

>Being used for lockdowns now?

 

Now, you don't think LOCKDOWNS are something important?

Their TESTS may be suspect (See Musk ref)??

There is a SENATOR involved, in the family???

 

Keep up anon on bigger picture though.

>>11656909

>He worked form a medical company called Dominion Diagnostics.

We know, we know.

>>11656952 agreed, that is all.

Anonymous ID: 65d65f Nov. 15, 2020, 10:39 a.m. No.11657355   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11657242

>This is an act of war, and we would be well within our rights to respond with the destruction of both countries governments.

Saving Israel for last? Specific reason for this?

Bibi's call with Trump, and congrats to Joe come to mind. Do they know what's coming? Likely!

Anonymous ID: 65d65f Nov. 15, 2020, 10:41 a.m. No.11657371   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11657339

>It IS a worldwide cabal. Seems that economies of scale in fraudulent elections would dictate using the same methods and machines again and again.

YOU are spot on Anon!

Nothing would get other anons, WW, more involved as well - ACCELERATION!