Most people are not aware of how much Scientology is about control.

This is not emphasized in their literature, nor broadcast when they are trying to sell you things, but much of their technologies are about control – how to control others.

You will notice, in the quote from L. Ron Hubbard, above, and in all teachings of Scientology, that nothing is said, and nothing is taught about ethical control. "Good" control is defined as effectively getting others to carry out your wishes, no matter what those wishes are, no matter what the other person might wish.

The Scientology Communications Course, which is one of their introductory courses, is promoted as teaching a person how to "communicate effectively". This course utilizes Hubbard's "TR Drills" to do this. These TR Drills are done on many courses as one trains on Scientology technologies.

And what are the goals of these TR Drills? The TRs are there to specifically and only teach a person how to get their commands complied with or get their questions answered. Period. They have no other purpose.

How to have a normal conversation? Not taught. How to create a friendly environment where normal conversations can take place? Not taught. How to make people feel at ease and draw them out? Not taught.

No, the Communications Course and all courses that utilize the TRs are only teaching a person how to control others through communication.

Lying

The only way to control people is to lie to them.

L. Ron Hubbard

On Control and Lying

Scientologists are taught, from very early on, not to tell non-Scientologists all about Scientology. Don't talk about past lives. Don't talk about "space opera". Don't talk about OT. Scientologists are carefully coached as to what to say and how to say it. And what not to say.

They call this "acceptable truths", "shore stories", "communicating at the proper 'reality level'" and other such euphemisms for lying.

Scientologists are told such lying is necessary because, otherwise, the public wouldn't respond correctly and wouldn't come in. In other words, Scientologists are taught to tell lies in order to control the public and bring them in.

It's all about control

There are many, many other examples of this in Scientology. Hubbard taught that there were many key phrases to cave a person in – so you could control them. Hubbard said that certain images from OT III materials would control people and cause them to be unable to resist buying his books. Hubbard believed in positioning as a way to secretly control the way people thought about Scientology so that they would react favorably, without facts and without logic.

https://askthescientologist.blogspot.com/2010/08/scientology-and-control.html?m=1

Really know how to rack up the felonies huh

There are several federal laws that address hacking, including:

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA);

The Stored Communications Act (SCA);

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA); and

The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA).

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) is the leading federal anti-hacking legislation that prohibits unauthorized access to another's computer system. Although the law was originally meant to protect the computer systems of U.S. government entities and financial institutions, the scope of the Act expanded with amendments to include practically any computer in the country (including devices such as servers, desktops, laptops, cellphones, and tablets).

Criminal Penalties Under the CFAA

The chart below provides select examples of violations of the CFAA and the penalties.

Offense

Penalties (Prison Sentence)

Obtaining National Security Information

10 years; 20 years maximum for a second conviction.

Accessing a Computer to Defraud and Obtain Value

5 years; 10 years maximum for a second conviction.

Accessing a Computer and Obtaining Information

1-5 years; 10 years maximum for a second conviction.1-10 years; 20 years maximum for a second conviction.

Intentionally Damaging by Knowing Transmission

1-10 years; 20 years maximum for a second conviction.

Extortion Involving Computers

5 years; 10 years maximum for a second conviction.

Trafficking in Passwords

1 year; 10 years maximum for a second conviction.

https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/hacking-laws-and-punishments.html

18 U.S. Code § 594.Intimidation of voters

U.S. Code

Notes

prev | next

Whoever intimidates, threatens, coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or to vote as he may choose, or of causing such other person to vote for, or not to vote for, any candidate for the office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner, at any election held solely or in part for the purpose of electing such candidate, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 720; Pub. L. 91–405, title II, § 204(d)(5), Sept. 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 853; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/594

If the world was just and fair and the laws applied to all instead of just some…..

So many of us have this place by the balls

Intent to Deceive Contract Law: Everything You Need to Know

Intent to deceive contract law pertains to fraudulent deception that results in a broken contract.3 min read

1. The Definition of Fraud

2. Proving Fraud

3. Fraud Remedies

Intent to deceive contract law pertains to fraudulent deception that results in a broken contract. To constitute a fraudulent misrepresentation, there must be the sustained intent to deceive an opposite party. The attribute of intent also mandates that a deceiver should know that information that a person spreads is untrue. Also, withholding information constitutes fraud. The technical term for such intent to do harm is also called a scienter. The scienter pertains to the etymology of the word science. Both words aim to the acquiring of knowledge. If you need to prove a case in court, ensure that you have sufficient evidence before going before a judge.

Where the law in concerned, fraud within agreements could find that scienter takes place where one party to an agreement knows that one of the facts affecting the agreement in question is not true as mentioned in the agreement. Scienter is also assessed by laws that govern agreements; wherein one party in a contract makes a statement with no regard as to whether the statement they made was or false or true. Laws note that such willful ignorance of an individual statement will rise to the level of fraudulent misrepresentation. Scienter may also be discovered to exist if a party accused has noted that his or her statements stem from personal research or knowledge, when such research or knowledge has no root in reality whatsoever.

https://www.upcounsel.com/intent-to-deceive-contract-law