>Wyoming’s 1st female senator-elect says Trump shouldn’t concede despite vote count
Guys, I'm having trouble understanding this.
This woman advocates for purchase of Bitcoin. She mentions that it's a great store of value, namely because, while our fiat currency inflates, Bitcoin has a finite supply.
What I'm confused about is that they also mention POTUS endorsed her!
Why would POTUS endorse this lady if she's advocating for buying Bitcoin? Wouldn't criminals just be the ones using Bitcoin?
Hasn't POTUS already denounced Bitcoin?