Anonymous ID: 4cc864 Nov. 15, 2020, 4:05 p.m. No.11660873   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0896 >>0971

>>11660813

>Been tidying up the breads

"tidying up the breads"?

???

 

>>11660821

>Eyes on Anons

>BAKER EDITED THE DOUGH FOR PRIOR NOTES

 

-red flag?

 

>>11660838

>-what, specifically, have you been tidying, bakes?

good question

>for transparencies sake

would be nice if baker would announce the changes being made…

Anonymous ID: 4cc864 Nov. 15, 2020, 4:19 p.m. No.11661044   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1189

>>11660971

>Perhaps it's because it appears there's a /comms/ baker in the kitchen

 

-banner image changed back to Q_ANON

-deleting previous bakers notables

-has to ghost from the bake the dough can be "cleaned" "fixed" and "tidy'd"

-wont clearly state what is beaning fixed in the dough when asked

 

how the fuck do you expect anons to react?

KEK

Anonymous ID: 4cc864 Nov. 15, 2020, 4:26 p.m. No.11661135   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11660138 (PB)

>have been reformatting dough

 

>>11660813

>Been tidying up the breads

 

baker, can I get an answer on this

-what, specfically, have you changed in the Dough?

-full transparency is required here

 

if its all simple shit done in good faith, just tell the anons what has been done so we can move on

 

what do?

Anonymous ID: 4cc864 Nov. 15, 2020, 4:33 p.m. No.11661214   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1286

>>11661189

>FILTERED in response?

kek, I know, anon

baker will not respond to my requests either

-reformatting?

-tidying?

-would be anything if the baker would just be clearin their language and tell anons what specifically is being done

-if its just a numbering correction, or a formatting error, then say so

-why be vague with the comms?

>When bakers statement is not founded

agreed anon

I dont see what is -wrong- with the formatting…