dChan
Anonymous ID: 27a3b6 Nov. 15, 2020, 5:03 p.m. No.11661585   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1663 >>1667 >>1673 >>1696 >>1726 >>1761 >>1769 >>1784

>>11661388

BAKERyou've fucked up theDoughwith your "formatting fixes".

 

Your #14888 and #14887 links at end of notes that you baked are fine.

 

YouCHANGEDthe links for:

#14886

Was:

>>11659750 #14886

Now:

>>11660176 #14886

 

#14885

was:

>>11658942 #14885

now:

>>11660170 #14885

 

#14884

was:

>>11658328 #14884 Anon collected

now (in Prev Collected):

>>11660166 #14884

 

Same for #14883

 

Your links take anons to the WRONG BREAD for the notable bun.

 

Why in the fuck would you do this? Please correct the dough as was handed off to you.

Anonymous ID: 27a3b6 Nov. 15, 2020, 5:15 p.m. No.11661741   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1821

>>11661673

>Comms

Yes. As long as the bakering smooth, we can be all "guud" as they'd say.

https://www2.qanonbin.com/trip/fEd7imYA7aU7

 

The fucky CIA/Disney notable was added back in (regardless of how notable it is, just a matter of principle), so dropping and sailing on.

Do like to see the link to links to Notes buns be within a bread, as it makes it easier for the fonefags to surf a bread, though once they get to a note, as long as there's a bun, can surf around within the bread notes.

Not always possible with e-bakes when they're scraped after the fact.

Anonymous ID: 27a3b6 Nov. 15, 2020, 5:20 p.m. No.11661796   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1854 >>1882

>>11661734 ty anon. Part of the 'trust network' we build, together in open waters.

>>11661726

>Because these bakers are comped, Shills.

Still not sure, though the whole Q_Anon and Lion thing seems pretty shady.

That and trying to get subvert things here so as to try a migration to /mnr/ always seems an angle.

Anonymous ID: 27a3b6 Nov. 15, 2020, 5:32 p.m. No.11661938   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1954

>>11661784

>There were too many broken links and messy notables.

Just looked. See one broken in the Dough for #14882 (DJT retweet of Leo Terrell..), but if link to Bun was left, the Bun was fine.

 

Saw another in #14885,

11658833 'Kraken' ..

Which was also in the original bun at end of bread.

Looks as if outgoing baker was working to highlight known issues and had correct dough numbering.

 

These aren't major issues (were there more).

In the process, you dropped a Notable which had to be put back, distracted several anons, including myself, and I detest oversight of the kitchen (and am most grateful for the work of bakers!).

You also changed the flow of the OP Image, which is questionable, given how much that was 'gone over' and a broad consensus reached.

 

Carry on Baker. Nothing is worth changing. Bakering practices noted.