Anonymous ID: f8079a Nov. 15, 2020, 8:21 p.m. No.11663852   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11663817

If you are a slave, you have earned it through previous sins in another life. If you are an elite, likewise- you have earned your position. Thus no reason to rebel against your masters, no reason to try and better your material position. It works almost as well at keeping people weak and passive as Christianity does.

Anonymous ID: f8079a Nov. 15, 2020, 8:25 p.m. No.11663892   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3919 >>3941

>>11663848

I actually take more issue with the idea that reincarnation creates perfect justice through karma lived out over multiple lifetimes than the idea of reincarnation itself. Evidence against the justice of the process exists by examining history. Most of history has been one form of feudalism or another, where the ruling class greatly oppresses and steals from the masses, who are reduced to bare bones survival. Given that this is the case, does it make sense that the ruling class has earned their position through previous lifetimes lived selflessly and charitably? If so, and they simply become corrupted by power as soon as they receive it, does not that argue that their previous lives of moral rectitude has little to do with their spiritual development, and is merely due to circumstance?

Anonymous ID: f8079a Nov. 15, 2020, 8:31 p.m. No.11663941   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3966 >>3978 >>3991

>>11663882

>>11663883

see

>>11663892

 

Yes. The All creates worlds to experience itself through individuated consciousness because the will to create is strong and the void is boring. Again, I think the error arises when we attempt to ascribe meaning or justice to the process. The world is unjust because the nature of being is unjust. It seems that the All cannot create good without evil, winning without losing, existence without hierarchy. This world is unjust because it is a reflection of spiritual law and reality, which is similarly so. As above so below.

Anonymous ID: f8079a Nov. 15, 2020, 8:36 p.m. No.11663973   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3998

>>11663919

Yes. It is a meaningless charade. To play the king we must also play countless roles as the subjects. This seems to be the law. The boredom of the void must be intense for us to create and consent to such experience. An endless cycle between the pain of existence, and the pain of boredom and the irresistible impulse to create. When in one state, usually longing for little else than to return to the other.

Anonymous ID: f8079a Nov. 15, 2020, 8:41 p.m. No.11664015   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4090

>>11663966

I don't think you are necessarily disagreeing with me. They are simply to sides of the same creation. Wealth requires poverty, love requires hate, and vice versa to exist. They are parts of the same thing, and inseparable from each other. If the All wishes to experience wealth, it means nothing without poverty, so poverty must be created, and since nothing is outside of the All, the all must experience poverty as well, and every gradation between the two poles of the wealth/poverty creation.

Anonymous ID: f8079a Nov. 15, 2020, 8:44 p.m. No.11664054   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4142

>>11663998

I disagree. Pain is required to experience pleasure. There is no lesson ultimately deeper than that. It is merely a game. There is no more meaning behind it than depriving oneself of food or sex for a time so that those things are more enjoyable when obtained. Our lives have the meaning of a video game.