https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/11/14/trump-lawyer-says-shes-about-to-release-the-kraken-im-going-to-expose-every-one-of-them-996267

Read what Sidney Powell said very very carefully.

“I can hardly wait to put forth all the evidence we have collected on Dominion,” she said, adding that the software was funded by money from Venezuela and Cuba.

“China has a role in it also. So if you wanna talk about foreign interference, we certainly have it now,” she continued.

Sidney Powell saying "China has a role" does NOT imply "China is guilty of tampering with a free and fair election"

She just said "China has a role".

And….what 'role' could that be exactly?

Drum roll please…

"What if China, Russia, and others are coordinating w/ POTUS to eliminate the NWO?" - Q140

China providing Q/Q+ with incriminating intel on Smartmatic and Dominion Voting Systems?

>>11669458

Agreed!

I think China has 'patriots' trying to get rid of the higher level communist infiltration there with the CCP just like American patriots are circumnavigating the C_A and removed/replaced corrupt FBI/DOJ/SD personnel.

Every country had a deep state.

Patriots in America, China and Russia and many other countries are fighting back.

>>11669485

>>11669450

Holy Projection Batman!

Macron is the fucker who is letting loose radical Islamic terror in his country.

Fucking Alinskyist con artist.

>>11669507

"When I found out"

How? From whom? Source?

Celebrity claims are one step above elephant farts for credibility.

>>11669501

>>11669518

Your panic and your cope is our energy.

>>11669548

Naked short selling is not theft.

This guy is a fraud.

>>11669573

This guy is a clown trying to throw NSA under the bus for 'inaction' in the face of FALSE CLAIMS like 'naked short selling is theft'.

He's a fuckingEx-CIAagent for fuck sakes.

Use discernment, people.

He's blaming WALL STREET.

Hello misdirection!

>>11669628

Yes, it is illegal, but it's not THEFT.

He's spewing a false narrative.

"$100s of trillions" is ridiculously wrong.

His real goal is to accuse the NSA of 'sitting on criminal information for 15 years'…to throw the NSA under the bus, and protect the real 'money changers' by blaming Wall Street bankers…

I do not and never will trust ANY 'ex-CIA' agent about ANYTHING NSA related.

>>11669663

You sound like you never took a business course or worked a day in finance in your entire life.

NSS is not 'theft'.

It is not theft to publish disinformation about ownership of shares to TRICK INVESTORS into setting different bid-asks than they otherwise would have.

Nobody 'steals' an investors money by affecting the market price of the shares they own.

It is a crime, yes, but it is not 'theft' because no money was stolen by one party from another. It's all predicated on the effect the practise has on stock prices.

To reject the false claim that NSS is theft is NOT TO CONDONE THE ACTION.

It is a clarification of what actually happens when people pretend to short shares that do not exist.

Go back to studying you dumb fuck, the fact you're DEFENDING an ex-CIA agent is all the proof in the world that it is precisely you who is 'glowing'.

>>11669548

>>11669573

The fact an ex-CIA agent is asserting what the NSA has and over how long as 'we have it all' should have been a red flag about his motivation.

Hundreds of trillions of dollars doesn't even exist, and the amount of money profit that has historically changed hands by covering shorts in the stock market is galactically dwarfed by this guy's claim of 'hundreds of trillions'.

>>11669779

It's very much intentional.

All Twitter has for 'official sources' is 'projection' from fake news outlets.

>>11669806

Ding ding ding.

The left 'represents' only a tint fraction of the country, but believing the fake news leads to people walking on eggshells to pretend it's 50-50

>>11669800

Consciousness of guilt right there!

>>11669832

Activate division shill script

[Last Name, First Name] is a ==[Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}], committed {Sin{crime}}.

I mention [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }}] because "it's a fact" that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

You need to read my words repeating that a person is nothing but a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}]. Keep [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.

Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code rules is to call YOU a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] person trying to defend [Last Name, First Name].

As I said before, [Last Name, First Name] being a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtapose [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] to a person, because it is a fact.

I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race or religion or class or political affiliation, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about [Last Name, First Name] being [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] as me trying to increase division by repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], and then my shill code is to reduce you to 'a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] shill trying to defend [Last Name, First Name] who is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So to reiterate, since it is a fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there is nothing deceitful going on in my repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there is [Last Name, First Name (z1)] who are not [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So on free speech boards like this one, any other poster who challenges me for pointing out the 'damning information' that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code is to dismiss all of them as themselves [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] who are only saying what they're saying to distract me and others from pointing out the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

>>11669956

>>11669943

SATANIC SCRIPT [SHILL WHINE]™ LOGIC FAIL: DIVIDING HUMANITY

Activate division shill script

[Last Name, First Name] is a ==[Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}], committed {Sin{crime}}.

I mention [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }}] because "it's a fact" that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

You need to read my words repeating that a person is nothing but a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}]. Keep [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.

Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code rules is to call YOU a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] person trying to defend [Last Name, First Name].

As I said before, [Last Name, First Name] being a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtapose [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] to a person, because it is a fact.

I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race or religion or class or political affiliation, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about [Last Name, First Name] being [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] as me trying to increase division by repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], and then my shill code is to reduce you to 'a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] shill trying to defend [Last Name, First Name] who is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So to reiterate, since it is a fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there is nothing deceitful going on in my repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there is [Last Name, First Name (z1)] who are not [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So on free speech boards like this one, any other poster who challenges me for pointing out the 'damning information' that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code is to dismiss all of them as themselves [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] who are only saying what they're saying to distract me and others from pointing out the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

>>11669976

CNN doesn't call elections,

GOP is retaining the majority,

>>11670025

Activate division shill script

[Last Name, First Name] is a ==[Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}], committed {Sin{crime}}.

I mention [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }}] because "it's a fact" that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

You need to read my words repeating that a person is nothing but a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}]. Keep [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.

Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code rules is to call YOU a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] person trying to defend [Last Name, First Name].

As I said before, [Last Name, First Name] being a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtapose [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] to a person, because it is a fact.

I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race or religion or class or political affiliation, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about [Last Name, First Name] being [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] as me trying to increase division by repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], and then my shill code is to reduce you to 'a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] shill trying to defend [Last Name, First Name] who is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So to reiterate, since it is a fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there is nothing deceitful going on in my repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there is [Last Name, First Name (z1)] who are not [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So on free speech boards like this one, any other poster who challenges me for pointing out the 'damning information' that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code is to dismiss all of them as themselves [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] who are only saying what they're saying to distract me and others from pointing out the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].

>>11670083

>>11670066

>>11670103