Sidney Powell begins to release the Kraken

“I’ve got a firsthand witness. In fact I’ve just emailed you an affidavit from a witness who can now be used publicly. It’s redacted in some places but he was present for the creation of the system for this specific purpose of falsifying election results for Hugo Chavez and then Maduro. They exported this all over Latin America . It’s the Smartmatic and Dominion systems that were built to do this very thing, for changing the results of elections… And he realized when things were happening the way they were here, particularly with the states the suddenly went down, they stopped counting the votes. It was because the need was so great to President Trump that they had to go in and do a separate reset on the machines to have them come out for Biden.”

Mark Steyn: And you have evidence of this affect? Witnesses to this affect?

Sidney Powell: I do, indeed.

>>11675824

Sidney Powell interview with Mark Steyn Twitter Thread

https://twitter.com/M2Madness/status/1328418358841274377

For those who prefer mp4s this thread is the complete interview

Secretary Raffensperger Issues Warning Against Activist Groups Helping Out of State Illegal Voters: 'We will catch you. We Prosecute'

Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger issued a warning to groups that are helping individuals move to Georgia solely for the purpose of voting in the January Senate runoffs elections. Groups that finance or organize such efforts are involved in conspiracy to commit voter fraud and could be charged under Georgia’s Racketeering Conspiracy laws. “Make no mistake about it, I will seek to prosecute those who try to undermine our elections to the fullest extent of the law,” said Raffensperger. “The integrity of our elections is paramount. Outside groups who seek to interfere with democracy in Georgia should be forewarned that the consequences will be severe.” Georgia law is clear about the seriousness of the crime committed by those looking to come to Georgia solely for the purpose of voting in the January 5 Senate runoff elections.

OCGA § 21-2-21(a)(4) requires that registrants be “a resident of this state and of the county or municipality in which he or she seeks to vote.” O.C.G.A. § 21-2-217(a)(1) adds that “the residence of any person shall be held to be in that place in which such person's habitation is fixed, without any present intention of removing therefrom;” this would include individuals who move to Georgia solely for the sake of casting a ballot in an election with no intention of remaining in the state

False registration, i.e. someone who registers to vote knowing that they do not possess the qualifications required by law, is a felony and can be punished by between one and ten years in prison, and/or up to a $100,000 fine (O.C.G.A § 21-2-561).

Any individual or group who organizes or finances efforts to bring individuals to Georgia to register falsely as electors may also potentially be charged with felony racketeering under O.C.G.A. § 16-14-3(5)(A)(xxii), which can be punishable by between 5 and 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $25,000 PER COUNT (O.C.G.A. § 16-14-5).

Georgia is recognized as a national leader in elections. It was the first state in the country to implement the trifecta of automatic voter registration, at least 16 days of early voting (which has been called the “gold standard”), and no-excuse absentee voting. Georgia continues to set records for voter turnout and election participation, seeing the largest increase in average turnout of any other state in the 2018 midterm election and record overall, early, in-person, and absentee-by-mail turnout during the November 2020 elections.

https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/secretary_raffensperger_issues_warning_against_activist_groups_helping_out_of_state_illegal_voterswe_will_catch_you_we_prosecute

>>11675872

This has been asked and answered several times.. Qresear.ch is your fren.. USE IT!

>>11676133

Sounds like it time for a DOJ intervention..violations of constitutional liberties, economic coup…

Court denies appeal by Michigan voters claiming election fraud

The Michigan Court of Appeals rejected an appeal in a legal challenge seeking to halt the certification of election results from Wayne County and initiate an independent audit of the election. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of two voters in Wayne County (where Detroit is located), was ruled against on Friday by Wayne County Judge Timothy Kenny, who called the plaintiffs’ claims “incorrect and not credible.” The Monday decision by the state’s Court of Appeals permits the Wayne County Board of Canvassers to complete its certification of the county’s election results by its Tuesday deadline. The lawsuit claimed there were several instances of election fraud at the TCF Center in Detroit, where Wayne County’s absentee ballots were tabulated after the Nov. 3 election. One of the individuals who filed an affidavit, Jessy Jacob, is a furloughed city worker who was temporarily assigned to the clerk’s office, according to court documents. Jacob alleged in her affidavit that she witnessed “City of Detroit election workers and employees coaching and trying to coach voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrat Party.”

In his Friday ruling, Kenny called the accusations by Jacob “serious” but stressed that the claims assert “behavior with no date, location, frequency, or names of employees.” Kenny also highlighted how Jacob came forward only after after President-elect Joe Biden was projected to be the winner based on the the unofficial election results for the state. David Kallman, who filed the lawsuit on behalf of the voters, told the Detroit Free Press after the lawsuit was first shot down on Friday that he thought there were “some points” in Kenny’s opinion that his team didn’t “feel were factually accurate.” The Washington Examiner left a voicemail with Kallman’s office on Monday night seeking further comment.

Kenny referenced six affidavits filed by the defendants in response to the lawsuit, highlighting former state elections director Christopher Thomas’s affidavit pushing back on claims of electoral malfeasance. “After analyzing the affidavits and briefs submitted by the parties, this Court concludes the Defendants offered a more accurate and persuasive explanation of activity within the Absent Voter Counting Board (AVCB) at the TCF Center,” he wrote in his decision. In addition to an independent audit of the county's election and a halt vote certification in Wayne County, the lawsuit also asked for a new election in the county. Wayne County was overwhelmingly won by Biden, with 68% of the vote to President Trump's 30.6%, translating to a difference of nearly 323,000 votes. Biden won the state of Michigan by about 144,532 votes, or a 2.6-point margin.

The loss Monday in the Michigan Appeals Court is separate from the Trump campaign’s lawsuit in Michigan federal court over fraud allegations. The Trump team lawsuit alleges several instances of electoral malfeasance, largely stemming from the TCF Center and claims from Republican poll challengers that they faced intimidation and harassment during the tabulation process. Prior to the federal litigation, the Trump campaign had filed a lawsuit in Michigan state court that was shot down. Another lawsuit filed in state court by a nonprofit group alleging fraud was also ruled against. The Washington Examiner reached out to Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett for comment.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/court-denies-appeal-by-michigan-voters-claiming-election-fraud

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Costantino-v-Detroit_Order-Denying-Relief.pdf

>>11676435

>>>11676286 (You)

>

>Rejecting legal claims is all part of the operation. I hope these cases get before honest judges at some point really fucking soon. The optics of repeated dismissals are not good.

Thinking the one thing going for these at the moment is these are brought by individuals rather than POTUS & Team.

>>11676533

>>>11676457 (You)

>

>What troubles me is the attitude being taken by judges to the eyewitness testimony. Although there’s much more evidence than has been presented, some of the affidavits are being used in multiple cases. More of something to which near zero evidentiary value is attributed is still near zero. The digital evidence will be more complex and open to challenge. This is how they planned to backstop the steal: frustrate the bringing of cases, regardless of the evidence.

This is as much a trap for those judges as it was for the election fraudsters.. The rulings they have made will come back to bite them in the form of being un-benched.