Agreed. This is highly specialized work. They need top h/w, s/w, and data forensic and cyber experts. It’s horses for courses, and no county IT team would ever have the high level skills or experience needed for such an exercise. They’re also not independent!
We know why CISA put out that statement: precisely to provide this sort of cover. It’s time for this fucking footsie to stop. Hit them where it hurts. Put up or shut up.
It should share its grass
All the Davos Gang look at the real and fake results side by side on their i tablets and masturbate furiously at their daring-do.
They’ve already committed fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. Certifying the results would just be another criminal act. They’ve got nowhere to go.
I understand the whole CA money scam, but you have to be some serious fuck up to shit in your own kitchen.
Who among the elite set wasn’t involved in election fraud? Seems like it would be quite a short list.
Rejecting legal claims is all part of the operation. I hope these cases get before honest judges at some point really fucking soon. The optics of repeated dismissals are not good.
What troubles me is the attitude being taken by judges to the eyewitness testimony. Although there’s much more evidence than has been presented, some of the affidavits are being used in multiple cases. More of something to which near zero evidentiary value is attributed is still near zero. The digital evidence will be more complex and open to challenge. This is how they planned to backstop the steal: frustrate the bringing of cases, regardless of the evidence.