>>11675587. >>11675041, >>11675111 older breads

>Our brilliant legislators here in CT wrote a Bill in 2018 that will pledge our Electoral Votes To National Popular-Vote Winner.

>That Shit’s gonna backfire on those jackass states and POTUS could literally win in a real, TOTAL and COMPLETE LANDSLIDE

>National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. The member states have to contribute their Electoral College votes. Presently, there are only 16 states in the Compact. They only total 196 votes. To even be considered legally binding there have to be 270 votes.

TY Anons. Will keep this simmering on backburner.

Asssuming that sufficient doubt will be cast on sufficient number of votes, across multiple states whether battleground or otherwise, the TRUMP investigative and legal team's werk on this will shew a story that will weigh very heavily against these 'COMPACT STATES' recanting on their pledge. In this sense, their own narritative about the Pop Vote will be deflated. And also shewn to be too risky, from the vantage point of the advocates of the 'COMPACT'. One effect would be to negate the completion of the COMACT in the future. An immediate impact would be to throw greater weight behind the claim of a 'TRUMP LANDSLIDE' won even against all the cheating that revealed the popular vote was also at stake.

BIG wins for the Federal system, the Electoral College, and cleaning up the voting system across the board.