Abortion was around long before it was legal - thousands of years. The burden (ALL of it) of abortion is carried by the mother - not the father. At best, men can imagine the issue, just as they imagine being shot. But the reality of it is far different. For this reason, I have a real problem with a bunch of old men sitting around and deciding this matter.
I also have issue with "one size fits all" that is inevitable with legal solutions. I have issue with supporting it financially when the division it causes is obvious. I have issue with the myriad complications that pregnancy has which are both visible and treatable today, where in the past they were unknown and resulted in 'miscarriage'. There are so many personal beliefs, circumstances, medical options and other issues that this issue will likely never be resolved legally to full satisfaction of both sides.
I do not know the answer, nor does anyone else or this would not be a divisive issue. I do know that few mothers would want their terminated baby "parted out" and sold off. So my suggestion is that we get rid of this atrocity FIRST, then seriously decide if we even want or need further government intrusion into a very personal issue.
Perhaps the answer is to get government OUT of the issue 100%, and let people do as they wish. The people bear the consequences for this at the most personal level, and restricting or funding either end of the issue seems unfair. This is freedom, and with it comes responsibility - as do consequences - at the most personal level.
I find it interesting to contemplate this discussion pre-1945, when miscarriage was more common, there was no such thing as 'neonatal' and government was subsidizing nothing.