lb/pb

>>11685649

>Q will not be addressing Patriots.

Of course not. Operators active. How much respect would you have for the US Military if they told you every move they were making in advance? Or, as Q posted:

Use Logic.

Why would we tell you the plan if in doing so also alerts those who we are actively engaged in HUNTING?

You are witnessing, first-hand, the demise of those in power [OLD GUARD].

Those who push simply have no grasp of reality.

Those who push simply do not understand warfare tactics.

Emotions cloud judgement.

Emotions cloud logic.

You have more than you know.

>>11686304

The media outlets - if they survive and recover, are facing a very difficult recovery. I wonder how they could accomplish that. Do you just replace the staff and continue as if you'd always broadcast the truth? Do you confess and expose your own wrongdoing in the hopes of keeping the brand? You did a fine job describing our neighbors: 'nothing is true unless it comes out of the media'. So how do we get them through this? Civil Defense loudspeakers? Take over the networks (wait a sec, the EO says we own them) - um, use our new establishment networks to 're-program' those who had been lost to their TVs?