https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1328879239035142144

Praying Medic

@prayingmedic

Nevada electoral college candidates pledged to President Trump have filed an election contest, citing irregularities, improprieties, and fraud that may have affected 40,000 votes.

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-electoral-college-candidates-in-nevada-file-election-contest/

November 17, 2020

TRUMP ELECTORAL COLLEGE CANDIDATES IN NEVADA FILE ELECTION CONTEST

Press Releases

Nevada’s electoral college candidates pledged to President Donald J. Trump today filed an election contest under Nevada’s election code, citing substantial irregularities, improprieties, and fraud that occurred in Nevada’s 2020 presidential election. The suit details the unreliability of the Agilis ballot processing and signature scanning machine used in Clark County, and the electronic voting machines used throughout the state. It also argues that the denial of observer access to the duplication process, and the impropriety of some Native American outreach programs that resulted in apparent vote-buying, cast substantial doubt on the results of the election. No less than 40,000 votes, and possibly more, were impacted by these various defects. This margin is greater than the margin between President Trump and Joe Biden in Nevada.

"We believe the discrepancies discovered in the days following Nevada's election and invited by the Democrat’s last-minute changes to the law monumentally influenced this presidential election to benefit Joe Biden, and as a result, these irregularities have deprived Nevadans of their right to a free and fair election," said Jenna Ellis, Trump Campaign Senior Legal Advisor. "These malicious actions, which have impacted more than 40,000 ballots, cannot be overlooked, and President Trump will continue battling for justice and seeking to restore Americans' faith in our electoral process."

The contest was filed in the First Judicial District Court in Carson City, Nevada, on behalf of six Nevada citizens and voters who were candidates for presidential electors in Nevada.

The contest filings are available here:

21 page PDF

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/nov-17-doc-2.pdf

>>11687522

6:54 PM · Nov 17, 2020·

Twitter for Android

315

Retweets

12

Quote Tweets

673

Likes

>>11687522

>No less than 40,000 votes, and possibly more, were impacted by these various defects. This margin is greater than the margin between President Trump and Joe Biden in Nevada.

>>11687522

>"We believe the discrepancies discovered in the days following Nevada's election and invited by the Democrat’s last-minute changes to the law monumentally influenced this presidential election to benefit Joe Biden, and as a result, these irregularities have deprived Nevadans of their right to a free and fair election," said Jenna Ellis, Trump Campaign Senior Legal Advisor. "These malicious actions, which have impacted more than 40,000 ballots, cannot be overlooked, and President Trump will continue battling for justice and seeking to restore Americans' faith in our electoral process."

>>11687527

#MarchForTrump #magamarch #magarally

Tracy Beanz:

I was honored to speak today at the March For Trump

20 views•Nov 14, 2020

https://youtu.be/QqNXXg0fLxI

House burnt today

total loss

>>11687611

she is alive and her famil yis safe

the stuff can be replaced

>>11687620

fuck this shit

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/covid-19-vaccination-refusal-mandate

Yes, the Government and Your Employer Can Make You Get a COVID-19 Vaccine

Experts say a COVID-19 vaccine mandate might be difficult to enforce, so public education or a limited mandate might be better solutions. Getty Images

Experts say it appears government agencies and even employers can require people to get a COVID-19 vaccine once it’s available.

However, they say such a mandate might be difficult to enforce, so public education might be a better option.

Another alternative would be to mandate that healthcare workers and people in high-risk groups get vaccinated.

All data and statistics are based on publicly available data at the time of publication. Some information may be out of date. Visit our coronavirus hub and follow our live updates page for the most recent information on the COVID-19 outbreak.

It’s still a long ways away, but the debate over COVID-19 vaccinations has already begun.

And if recent experiences with measles vaccines and face masks are any indication, all those months of waiting might be needed to have enough time to build public support.

Dr. Anthony FauciTrusted Source, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told Congress on Friday that he’s cautiously optimistic that we’ll have a vaccine by the end of this year and as we go into 2021.

But as researchers race to develop and test potential vaccines, groups have shown up at rallies against lockdown orders or face mask requirements. And there’s skepticism in even the less-extreme segments of the population as well.

A May survey found that less than two-thirds of U.S. adults were “very” or “somewhat” interested in getting a COVID-19 vaccine.

In a different survey, nearly a quarter said they wouldn’t be willing to get a COVID-19 vaccine, including nearly two-thirds of those who were skeptical of vaccines in general.

And a June survey found about 27 percent of adults would “probably” or “definitely” not get a COVID-19 vaccine.

“One group will start running and rolling up their sleeves, and one group is not so sure and will wait to see if anything bad happens and then consider it,” Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease expert at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee, told Healthline.

Skepticism about an as-yet unproven and nonexistent medication that promises to return the world to “normal” life may seem understandable for now.

But the open, albeit still hypothetical, question is whether that skepticism will remain if a vaccine has been proven safe and effective.

If so, can governments or employers mandate that people get vaccinated? And will they?

The answer to the first question appears to be yes. There are already vaccine requirements for diseases, such as measles or tuberculosis, to attend or work at many schools.

And there are requirements for diseases such as polio to travel to most countries.

Certain exemptions to those requirements have been tightened up in many states as high-profile outbreaks of measles in places like Disneyland revealed the extent of the anti-vaccination movement in some communities.

But while voluntary compliance in the name of protecting yourself and others is ideal, the anti-vaccination movement underlines why the nation might need requirements in an emergency, such as the current pandemic.

“What concerns me is when I see the types of fights over wearing a mask. I can’t even imagine what would happen over vaccines,” said Debbie Kaminer, a law professor at Baruch College in New York who has written about the legal questions around vaccination laws and exemptions.

continued:

>>11687620

>>11687697

continued: https://www.healthline.com/health-news/covid-19-vaccination-refusal-mandate

Plan A: Education

Kaminer recently wrote about the legality of states and employers requiring people to get a COVID-19 vaccine.

In her column, she writes, “People are often surprised to learn that states would likely have the legal right to enforce such a rule.”

Still, the ideal scenario would be compliance through public education. To Kaminer, though, that public education needs to have already begun by now — not once a vaccine is available.

“At the very least, there should be an enormous public education campaign going on right now, and that really hasn’t been happening the way it should,” she told Healthline.

Kaminer says a big part of that should be relying on people who can get the attention of particular communities.

She notes how polio vaccine rates surged after a young Elvis Presley got the vaccine on “The Ed Sullivan Show” in 1956, and how the Orthodox Jewish Nurses Association played a key role in convincing some people in Orthodox Jewish neighborhoods to get the measles vaccine amid an outbreak in New York last year.

“Find the people who communities listen to and start that campaign now,” Kaminer said.

The catch could be that the opposite may be true in communities skeptical of a vaccine.

An April study found Americans who voted for President Donald Trump are more concerned about potential harms of vaccines than other voters, and that the president’s tweets can firm up their opposition.

But it can also work both ways.

In one of the earlier surveys about attitudes toward a potential COVID-19 vaccine, more than a third of respondents said they would be less — not more — willing to get a vaccine if President Trump said it was safe.

Only 14 percent said Trump saying it was safe would make them more willing to get it.

“We have both anti-vaxxers and those who don’t trust Trump, who think he just wants to say he has a vaccine,” Kaminer noted. “So there’s people on both sides.”

That makes this a unique situation, she says, adding that the name of the current White House vaccine project doesn’t help.

“I could not think of a worse name than Operation Warp Speed,” Kaminer said.

That’s because the title implies the vaccine is being rushed through.

HEALTHLINE RESOURCES

Until you get through this, count on our support

In difficult times, you need to be able to turn to experts who understand and can help strengthen your mental well-being. We’re here for you.

continued:

>>11687718

>>11687620

>>11687697

continued: https://www.healthline.com/health-news/covid-19-vaccination-refusal-mandate

Plan B: Targeted mandates

So, with education an ideal but tricky option in the current scenario, requiring certain high-risk groups could be an important tool.

This would include before the vaccine becomes plentiful and widely available.

“When vaccines first become available, they won’t be available in a sufficient quantities to vaccine everyone on day one,” Schaffner said.

As in past emergencies, such as 2009’s H1N1 outbreakTrusted Source and 2014’s Ebola outbreakTrusted Source, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advisory committee is going through a “very rigorous process… to figure out, to put it colloquially, who should go to the front of the line, who should go to the middle of the line, and who should wait a little bit,” Schaffner said.

He notes that education has an important role to play here, too, and that it would be important to be transparent about who’s getting the vaccine and why.

But, Schaffner says, there appears to be a “rather a uniform opinion in surveys that the first folks should be healthcare workers in contact with COVID, because we need to keep them as healthy as possible so they can take care of people with COVID and not get sick themselves.”

The CDC committee’s emerging thinking appears to follow that idea, with a preliminary five-tier sketch of the plan placing those workers in the top tier, followed by others working in healthcare and essential jobs, as well as those deemed high-risk of severe COVID-19 complications.

Schaffner says attention is being paid to focus equity and make sure all segments of the population are considered as any prioritization scheme is set up.

But as for requiring certain segments to get it once it’s available to everyone, the picture is less clear.

As for employers being able to require a COVID-19 vaccine, Kaminer notes in her article that while most employers would likely be hesitant to try it, they likely could, especially given the “significant cost to having an unimmunized workforce” amid the pandemic.

Schaffner says it’s possible that healthcare institutions could require workers get the COVID-19 vaccine, as some states already require they get flu shots.

Or maybe people in the armed forces would be required to get it.

But it’s just speculation for now, and Schaffner sees it’s probably unlikely.

“If you come on our property at Vanderbilt Medical Center and want to enter a building, you’re going to have your temperature taken, but that’s very different than obliging people to get a vaccine, and I don’t think that will happen,” he said.

“There may be some subpopulations where there is a requirement, but I would be hugely surprised if there’s a broader requirement,” he added.

(in between the article

CORONAVIRUS UPDATES

Stay on top of the COVID-19 pandemic

We’ll email you the latest developments about the novel coronavirus and Healthline's top health news stories, daily.

Enter your email

Your privacy is important to us

Plan C: General mandates

That broader requirement — while likely legal — would be a last resort and unlikely option, experts say.

The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected multiple lawsuits stating that vaccine mandates infringed on people’s liberties.

But in addition to the potential outcry and conspiracy theories, enforcing a broad requirement may just be too difficult to enforce.

“I don’t think anybody is going to compel people to get a vaccine,” Schaffner said.

So, to avoid that, education may be key.

There may be a ways yet to go. After her article about the legal underpinnings for vaccine requirements was posted, Kaminer says “almost all” the comments were from people who were anti-vaccine.

But there’s still plenty of time.

A safe, effective vaccine is — at least — many months away.

Written by Matt Berger on August 3, 2020 — Fact checked by Maria Gifford

>>11687620

>>11687697

>>11687718

>>11687737

>>11687730

>>11687697

>Skepticism about an as-yet unproven and nonexistent medication that promises to return the world to “normal” life may seem understandable for now.

>But the open, albeit still hypothetical, question is whether that skepticism will remain if a vaccine has been proven safe and effective.

>If so, can governments or employers mandate that people get vaccinated? And will they?

The answer to the first question appears to be yes. There are already vaccine requirements for diseases, such as measles or tuberculosis, to attend or work at many schools.

>And there are requirements for diseases such as polio to travel to most countries.

>>11687667

nice

>>11687544

these are homes with many guns in most of the state

>>11687572

Beanz speaks on 14th at the Million MAGA March

Flynn thanks Beanz Nov 15 in tweet

her house burnt on the 17

17 is letter Q

Pinned Tweet

1st Amendment Praetorian

@1st_praetorian

Not sure about you sir, but we’re nowhere near tired of winning over here.

#DeOppressoLiber

Quote Tweet

General Flynn

@GenFlynn

· Nov 15

Thank you @tracybeanz for all you do & @RobertPLewis for your team of professionals. 1st Praetorian helps us; they now need our help. Consider donating to support these American Patriots Flag of United States

@marklevinshow

@RealRLimbaugh

@TuckerCarlson

@seanhannity twitter.com/tracybeanz/sta…

>>11687885

>>11687572

video

re: fire

cannot get it to upload

https://www.pscp.tv/w/1ynJOBLMBWqGR

Ended 49 minutes ago

A Huge Thank You.

Tracy Beanz

@tracybeanz

https://twitter.com/GenFlynn/status/1328115083214532608

General Flynn

@GenFlynn

Thank you

@tracybeanz

for all you do &

@RobertPLewis

for your team of professionals. 1st Praetorian helps us; they now need our help. Consider donating to support these American Patriots Flag of United States

@marklevinshow

@RealRLimbaugh

@TuckerCarlson

@seanhannity

https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1328045016992903169

Quote Tweet

Tracy Beanz

@tracybeanz

· Nov 15

There aren’t any words to explain how absolutely life saving the guys of @1st_praetorian are. They protected us yesterday during the March. These are absolute heroes. Consider donating to them so they can continue giving to us.

https://classy.org/campaign/1st-amendment-praetorian/c305874

Show this thread

4:18 PM · Nov 15, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

8.8K

Retweets

311

Quote Tweets

23K

Likes

>>11687572

>>11688012

>>11687885

video:

Tracy Beanz

@tracybeanz

A Huge Thank You.

https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1328873605862572034

https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1328891413543620608

Praying Medic

@prayingmedic

Oh, look. Face with rolling eyes

Quote Tweet

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

· 2h

Director Krebs worked diligently to safeguard our elections from interference and misinformation.

He protected our democracy. And spoke truth to power.

That’s why Trump retaliated and fired him.

It’s pathetic and predictable from a president who views truth as his enemy.

7:42 PM · Nov 17, 2020·Twitter for Android

127

Retweets

24

Quote Tweets

592

Likes

>>11688229

yep

>>11688096