Anonymous ID: 21538c Nov. 17, 2020, 9:13 p.m. No.11689758   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11689704

Publishing the obit was passed off as a “clerical mistake” at the time. Not sure anyone bought that. The BBC is fons et origo for mind control, so it’s likely that there was as some calculated purpose. Your note on the digits confirms.

Anonymous ID: 21538c Nov. 17, 2020, 9:21 p.m. No.11689826   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11689763

Obviously she didn’t die then. It was conditioning. But the obit is tailored to precise circumstances - sick over Christmas and dying in early Jan at Sandringham. Charles and Anne visiting Sandringham.

 

It wasn’t a canned announcement, accidentally released. Neither did the Queen narrowly cheat death at that time. This was something else.

Anonymous ID: 21538c Nov. 17, 2020, 9:28 p.m. No.11689875   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11689142

Not much room for doubt that they knew exactly what they were doing, planned for it, and that they avoided sharpies in the early voting period so that their scam wasn’t exposed through voter complaints in the run up to 11/3.