>>11689944

>AI algorithms

>>11690355

>lmao when I saw a totally Engrish ad for "SEXY GAY MAN UNDERWEAR!"

AI is totally overrated when it comes to things that matter, and the problem is that it is asexual. It cannot possibly grasp that a vast proportion of the things an individual man or woman does are shaped by erotic inclinations, even things that don't overtly seem connected to them at all. (For instance, a man doesn't wish to be a coward in a fight, and even if he is not "simply" trying to impress women, and shouldn't be, he knows that women would rightly despise him if he were a coward.)

To get "sexual" AI, you'd basically have to cread individual artificial life forms that would act as INDIVIDUALS in some artificial (or "real") world, and ultimately wouldn't give a fuck about Sundar Pichai and other such nonentities.

>>11690427

Actually, this is why THEY want to obliterate "gender" and replace our natural (if highly culturally shaped) identities as men or women with a motley collection of "sexual preferences" and fetishes that are all "equally good". Our conception of how to manifest human virtue is highly tied to our identities as men and women. If you eliminate men and women, you effectively eliminate human virtue, and then we can all be easily ruled by the bureaucratic machine.

>>11690482

Do you believe in coincidences?