That word 'may' again.
If you all have hard, conclusive evidence - evidence that no court could argue around or through or above or under - then please, please provide it and end this mock 'cliffhanger' circus.
'We got it, we got it, we got it' - then show it. Plus, usually there are arrests before courts decide on stuff. So if genuine fraud has been rife, law enforcement should already be activated.
But no, that doesn't seem to be preferable. First it seems we gotta hear from the Supreme Court. Why? Is it their role to do criminal investigations and arrest suspects?