Q: "Durham."
So, last Friday, that's all Q had to offer. Today, we learn that Durham's investigations were always meant to be a strawman, and now Durham is dropping all hints of his facade of investigating anyone. Barr has a history of covering up for the Deep State. How could POTUS have trusted such a villain?
First, nice trips. 8's no less.
Next, Q's most recent post is listed at the top of the bread. I'm assuming you know that already.
Finally, the Durham dropped the ball sauce is here: <https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-11-17-sham-durham-afraid-blowback-biden-admin-dropping-russiagate.html>
The author has been a huge Trump supporter, so it's a reasonably reliable report.
>So he had a personal interest in having the vote certified?
Are you implying that his vested interest makes it acceptable to threaten the children of an election official?
Notable
This is confirmation that the Scytl server in Frankfurt was nabbed by the US Army.
>Can it be argued court that the certification was signed under duress and is invalidated?
One can argue anything, but the test will be, does the argument stand scrutiny, and does it change the outcome?
That's how it read for me: "Nothing to see here; move along" [as a fireworks storehouse is exploding behind him]
This highlights why I'm concerned with the Catholic infiltration of the US Supreme Court - Kavanaugh and Barrett most recently. Evengelicals and Protestant Christians are sorely under-represented compared to their actual proportion of the US population.
That article read like a standard smoothing-ver after a limited hangout. "Nothing to see here; move along."