>>11692984 (lb)
I think this is the funniest thing I've seen since So So Def Recordings.
Poll your neighborhood and ask how many have given up all news outlets except for OAN.
BAKER IS A 3 PUMP CHUMP fan boy
Top of the morning 3 pump chump FAN BOY BAKER. I see you are turned on by the LAME HEADLINE, then you are gushing at the second PASTE of that lame headline, and you BLOW YOUR WAD to the third PASTE of that lame headline. Yup, thats a notable, maybe sauce but most likely not just three fucking lame fragmented sentece repeated three times.
As stated before, SHILL SEX is BORING !!!
Do Anons remember back when we dug shit, and posted ACTUAL NOTABLES, but dont get us wrong, we appreciate the PLACE HOLDER job that you shills perform for us. As an EMTanon it was what we called a TKO inter veneous line, weren't pushing meds yet but had a saline line TO KEEP OPEN into the vein for IMMEDIATE introduction of meds. shills do the same for our breads, they fill them with shit so that there is always a so called fresh bread for Q to post on. Being as I am only seeing about 4 ids involved with your lame op you must be running out of funds at Media Matters yes??
Great, perhaps he/she/shill got their traitor's justice, and they wont be back.
Trump Readies “Emergency Constitution” As May-2020 War Declaration Joins National Emergency Election
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index3396.htm
A foreboding new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today discussing events relating to Day 16 of the election war currently raging in America, says least being noticed about what President Donald Trump did after his declaring the 2020 election a national emergency with his signing into law Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election on 12 September 2018, was what he joined it with, and why.
An explanation for which is provided by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), that works exclusively for the United States Congress, and among whose many duties are them documenting wars their nation has declared—which is why the Ministry of Defense (MoD) took exceptional notice this past summer when the Congressional Research Service released the document “U.S. Periods of War and Dates of Recent Conflicts Updated June 5, 2020”, wherein it grimly noted: “On May 20, 2020, President Donald J. Trump issued a Notice to Congress: “… in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to the stabilization of Iraq declared in Executive Order 13303”—the consequence of which means that President Trump placed the United States in a state of war for a period existing from 20 May 2020 to 20 May 2021.
A now existing state of war that gives President Trump extraordinary powers under the little know legal doctrine called the “Emergency Constitution”—one of whose most fearful provisions of is “The Suspension Clause”, that President Trump can use to imprison anyone found to be a threat to America and its survival—are unlimited war time powers conferred upon any President of the United States by the United States Supreme Court, as confirmed by the ruling made during World War II by this high court in a case involving Nazi Germany saboteurs—and whose decision said: “Even had they been civilians properly domiciled in the United States at the outbreak of the war, they would have been subject under the statutes to restraint and other disciplinary action by the President without appeals to the courts…In any event, the Court rejected the jurisdictional challenge by one of the saboteurs on the basis of his claim to U.S. citizenship, finding U.S. citizenship wholly irrelevant to the determination of whether a wartime captive is an “enemy belligerent” within the meaning of the law of war”.
And with the Supreme Court ruling that “US citizenship is wholly irrelevant to the determination of whether a wartime captive is an enemy belligerent”, it puts into immediate sharp focus the warning just issued by retired United States Air Force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney—a unique military officer who graduated from West Point into the US Army, then joined the US Air Force—and who has just described the election as: “This is the first massive attack in United States history”.
A first in history massive attack on the United States showing why President Trump declared this election to be a national emergency and placed his nation into a state of war to defend against—and sees the attacking enemy being those who used the HAMR (or Hammer) computer and the Scorecard software developed in the late 2000s, that was commandeered by the Obama-Biden Regime and used to steal the 2012 election, and is now being used to steal the election on Biden's behalf—the evidence of which played out on election night when this corrupted voting software flipped votes from Trump to Biden while the American people watched it happening in real time—and now has seen Super Lawyer Sidney Powell shockingly revealing the affidavit she has from a high ranking military officer who participated in this massive attack.
The silent war continues.
Cue automatic troll trigger in 3…
3307
Mar 29, 2019 5:25:10 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No. 5967016
When they can’t attack the information provided, they attack the messenger.
Define ‘deflection’.
Logical thinking.
Shill count HIGH.
Q
>http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index3396.htm
According to this report, soon after President Trump fired Deep State operative Director of Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Chris Krebs for lying about this election being secure yesterday, the socialist Democrat Party controlled Supreme Court of Pennsylvania rejected a Trump Campaign lawsuit against this election—that now propels this case towards the United States Supreme Court, where famed legal scholar Alan Dershowitz predicts it will be won by President Trump—a prediction applying to other Trump Campaign legal filings against this election, whose staggering and growing by the hour evidence of election fraud is as stunning as it’s terrifying—election fraud evidence further described in such articles like “Michigan and Georgia, Like in PA and VA, Caught in SAME PATTERN! — Once Biden Gained Lead with MASSIVE Vote Dumps, The Remainder of Votes All Possessed Same Biden to Trump Vote Ratio – THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE!” and “Elections Security Expert Finds Michigan Results a COMPLETE FRAUD — Current Machines Do Not Have Capability to Count the Mass Dumps for Biden in Reported Time Period”—and in knowing first hand how this massive attack on the United States in this election was carried out, is why Super Lawyer L. Lin Wood yesterday told the American people the truth that President Trump had won this election by over 400 electoral votes.
Though the American people are being kept from knowing the full and horrible dimensions of this election war, this report concludes, the same most certainly can’t be said about Communist Chinese leader Xi Jinping, who in terror has just noted that the world economy is in its worst recession since the Great Depression, and stated: “At present, the world is caught between the most serious pandemic in the past century and momentous changes never seen in the last one hundred years”—a statement coming at the same time nuclear bomb capable US bombers have entered into the Communist Chinese Defense Zone as Beijing mounts massive naval drills—which keeps the Communist Chinese from interfering with what is now going on in the United States—an America that on average sees about 250 military aircraft in its skies during the day—but yesterday freightingly saw American skies being flooded with over 1,000 military aircraft, including at least one flight from Washington D.C. to GITMO [Note: Video at link and below has short transmission delay where audio isn’t heard, just wait.]—the meaning of which shows this election war isn’t ending, it’s just getting started.
If you don't have a small plane with a distinct sound doing exact 4 or 8 minute orbits over your house for a constant 6 to 8 house while flying in and out of known commercial aircraft decent routes with NO transponder broadcasting, you're doing it wrong.
The Suspension Clause
https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/interpretation/article-i/clauses/763
The Suspension Clause protects liberty by protecting the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus. It provides that the federal government may not suspend this privilege except in extraordinary circumstances: when a rebellion or invasion occurs and the public safety requires it.
Appreciating the significance of this restraint first requires understanding the writ of habeas corpus. This writ, which Americans imported into the Constitution from English common law, is a means by which a prisoner can test the legality of her detention. A person who believes she is being imprisoned illegally can file a petition asking a judge to issue a writ of habeas corpus. When a prisoner files a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, her custodian must explain why the restraint is lawful. If the explanation does not satisfy the court, it will order the custodian to release her. The writ is thus a crucial means by which a prisoner can obtain freedom.
Today, the writ of habeas corpus is primarily used by those serving prison sentences to challenge the legality of the process that resulted in their conviction. Historically, however, the writ was primarily used by those imprisoned without judicial process. Early Americans were keenly aware that monarchs of England had sometimes jailed people indefinitely without charging or trying them in court. Although the writ of habeas corpus existed, the king often ignored it. To protect against such abuse, Parliament enacted the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 to ensure that the king released prisoners when the law did not justify confining them. This “Great Writ” guaranteed prisoners held on authority of the crown the right to invoke the protection of the judicial process.
The founding generation valued the Great Writ because they had this history in mind. Yet those who framed and ratified the Constitution also believed that in times of crisis, the executive might need leeway to hold suspects without answering to a court. Parliament had suspended the writ during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries when it concluded that the king needed expanded detention power to contain threats. Similarly, several states had equipped their governors with emergency power by suspending the writ during the Revolutionary War. Pre-ratification practice thus embraced both the importance of the writ and the need for a safety valve.
The Suspension Clause follows in this tradition. It protects the writ by imposing a general bar on its suspension. At the same time, it makes an exception for cases when an invasion or rebellion endangers the public safety. A suspension is temporary, but the power it confers is extraordinary. When a suspension is in effect, the president, typically acting through subordinates, can imprison people indefinitely without any judicial check.
The Clause does not specify which branch of government has the authority to suspend the privilege of the writ, but most agree that only Congress can do it. President Abraham Lincoln provoked controversy by suspending the privilege of his own accord during the Civil War, but Congress largely extinguished challenges to his authority by enacting a statute permitting suspension. On every other occasion, the executive has proceeded only after first securing congressional authorization. The writ of habeas corpus has been suspended four times since the Constitution was ratified: throughout the entire country during the Civil War; in eleven South Carolina counties overrun by the Ku Klux Klan during Reconstruction; in two provinces of the Philippines during a 1905 insurrection; and in Hawaii after the bombing of Pearl Harbor.
The most hotly debated questions concerning the Suspension Clause involve its effect in the absence of a formal suspension.
A threshold question is whether the Clause simply restrains Congress’s ability to suspend whatever habeas jurisdiction is currently on the books, or whether the Clause grants an affirmative right to habeas review (or an adequate substitute for it). On the one hand, the Clause’s general bar on suspension assumes that some access to habeas relief will exist when the privilege of the writ has not been suspended. On the other hand, as Chief Justice Marshall noted in Ex Parte Bollman (1807) the Clause does not itself expressly guarantee that access. The Court seems to have resolved this dispute in Boumediene v. Bush (2008), where it held that the Clause does not simply restrain Congress’s ability to suspend existing habeas statutes but affirmatively guarantees prisoners some forum in which they can challenge the legality of their detention. Also in Boumediene, the Court decided—to much controversy—that habeas jurisdiction extends to prisoners detained outside the United States at Guantanamo Bay.
In recent years, the writ is most commonly sought by convicted defendants in state prison. Each year, over 18,000 petitions for the writ of habeas corpus are filed in federal court by state prisoners against their prison wardens. But a very slim fraction of those petitions are actually successful, in part due to the limits Congress placed on federal courts reviewing habeas petitions when it enacted the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). AEDPA significantly limited federal courts’ power to grant habeas relief for state prisoners.
The questions about the scope of and limits on the Great Writ are far from settled. Both the Supreme Court’s Guantanamo decisions and AEDPA remain controversial, as we grapple with the Founders’ vision of the writ and the proper balance to strike between liberty and security.
mah nigga
WTF – MULTIPLE VOTING: Check out the VoterID numbers, and the BallotID numbers
https://i.maga.host/77TCEvq.png
https://thedonald.win/p/11QRanefV2/wtf–multiple-voting-check-out-t/c/
>compromised The_Donald subreddit.
More info please? What happened?
I heard it was shut down by reddit.
Back at you anon. :D
I wonder what Judges will get the majority if not all of the lawsuits. Just so happen to get assigned to Obama judges every single time. Last hope is SCOTUS when this is all over with.