And that motherfucking piece of shit of course tried the 'racism' card to justify his threats.
These people are absolutely stupid.
It's not, without sign off.
They did not sign off.
They verbally voted to certify to stop the threats and harassment, but it's not a certification without signatures.
I thought he did very well.
Ezra Cohen is a really good public speaker. Happy to see he has skillsets that extend beyond intelligence.
Refreshing actually.
The anti-Tucker narrative is only happening because his reports threaten the D party, the deep state, and the nwo.
Predictable.
Very interesting. I think he is much better than 'mediocre'.
That's like saying if we're not Cicero, we're shite.
Nah, you're projecting, you're on the wrong board. This board is not the fake news straw man of 'qtards waiting for a fix'. That's a projection of your own reality with msdnc fake news soundbites.
Go back to sucking Nazi Soros dick for shekels you brainlet.
But how could she catch them? She'll stop after a few steps huffing and puffing and needing another donut.
I also never said you said anything about Cicero, it was analogy to the comparison with very very good public speakers.
D's needed to win the House while R's needed to win Senate.
I wouldn't trust TheDonald.win if you paid me. Run by former mods of compromised The_Donald subreddit.
Yeah, 'shut down' as a psyop pretext for future censorship. It was the same people running Reddit as was running The_Donald.
Read Q drops on social media 'bans' of Alex Jones.
Ya know…while I am not a PhD in data analytics, I am starting to detect a pattern each day.
>Divides by religion
Activate division shill script
[Last Name, First Name] is a ==[Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}], committed {Sin{crime}}.
I mention [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }}] because "it's a fact" that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
You need to read my words repeating that a person is nothing but a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}]. Keep [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.
Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code rules is to call YOU a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] person trying to defend [Last Name, First Name].
As I said before, [Last Name, First Name] being a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtapose [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] to a person, because it is a fact.
I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race or religion or class or political affiliation, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about [Last Name, First Name] being [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] as me trying to increase division by repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], and then my shill code is to reduce you to 'a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] shill trying to defend [Last Name, First Name] who is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
So to reiterate, since it is a fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there is nothing deceitful going on in my repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there is [Last Name, First Name (z1)] who are not [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
So on free speech boards like this one, any other poster who challenges me for pointing out the 'damning information' that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code is to dismiss all of them as themselves [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] who are only saying what they're saying to distract me and others from pointing out the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
>https://www.breitbart.com/
Not an argument, no sauce, no reference material, just a link and a claim.
PANIC
>Doubles down on dividing by religion
Activate division shill script
[Last Name, First Name] is a ==[Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}], committed {Sin{crime}}.
I mention [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }}] because "it's a fact" that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
You need to read my words repeating that a person is nothing but a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, …}]. Keep [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.
Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code rules is to call YOU a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] person trying to defend [Last Name, First Name].
As I said before, [Last Name, First Name] being a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtapose [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] to a person, because it is a fact.
I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race or religion or class or political affiliation, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about [Last Name, First Name] being [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] as me trying to increase division by repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], and then my shill code is to reduce you to 'a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] shill trying to defend [Last Name, First Name] who is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
So to reiterate, since it is a fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], there is nothing deceitful going on in my repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there is [Last Name, First Name (z1)] who are not [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].
So on free speech boards like this one, any other poster who challenges me for pointing out the 'damning information' that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code is to dismiss all of them as themselves [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }] who are only saying what they're saying to distract me and others from pointing out the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y4}, Sex{y5}, … }].