2020 Election Litigation Tracker

https://www.scotusblog.com/election-litigation/

Election Cases We’re Watching

Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar

Whether a decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court requiring the state to count mail-in ballots received up to three days after Election Day, as long as they are not clearly postmarked after Election Day, violates federal election law and the Constitution.

U.S. Supreme Court

Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Benson

Whether Michigan's constitution and election laws require that absentee ballots be counted in the presence of an "elections inspector" from each political party; and if so, whether the state should stop counting ballots until that requirement is met or separate ballots counted without representatives of both parties present.Michigan Court of Claims

Hotze v. Hollins

Whether nearly 127,000 votes cast via drive-through voting during the early voting period in Harris County, Texas, which contains much of the city of Houston, violate state election laws and should be invalidated.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit

Carson v. Simon

(1) Whether a measure by Minnesota elections officials extending the deadline for timely postmarked absentee ballots to be received and still counted until one week after Election Day violates the U.S. Constitution; and (2) whether the challengers, two nominees to serve as Republican Party presidential electors in Minnesota, have legal standing to challenge the measure.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit

Texas League of United Latin American Citizens v. Abbott

Whether Texas' limitation of one absentee ballot drop-off site per county violates the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit

Michigan Alliance for Retired Americans v. Benson

Whether a policy by the secretary of state of Michigan extending the deadline to receive absentee ballots that are postmarked by Election Day until 14 days after Election Day violates federal law and the U.S Constitution.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar

Whether a number of Pennsylvania elections accommodations in light of the coronavirus pandemic – providing additional drop-off sites and alleviating signature-matching requirements for absentee ballots, as well as lifting a restriction on employing out-of-county poll workers – violate state election law and the U.S. Constitution.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Mi Familia Vota v. Hobbs

Whether previous stay-at-home orders and other closures due to the coronavirus pandemic justify an extension of Arizona's voter registration deadline past the original date of Oct. 5, 2020.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit

Arizona Democratic Party v. Hobbs

Whether recent changes to Arizona's election procedures – which provide both absentee voters whose signatures on their mail-in ballots cannot be verified, and in-person voters who cannot provide proper identification at the polls, up to five days after Election Day to remedy their ballot identification issues – must also be extended to absentee voters who submit unsigned ballots.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit

The New Georgia Project v. Raffensperger

Whether Georgia's requirement that absentee ballots be received by 7 p.m. on Election Day poses an unconstitutional infringement on the right to vote in light of the coronavirus pandemic.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit

Memphis A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Hargett

Whether Tennessee may enforce a number of vote-by-mail regulations for the November 2020 election, including preventing first-time voters from applying for an absentee ballot, barring third-party distribution of absentee ballot applications, and a process for verifying signatures on mail-in ballots.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit

>>11693787

Washington v. Trump

Whether recent changes announced to the United States Postal Service violate federal administrative rulemaking requirements and infringe upon the rights of states to regulate elections under the Constitution.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington

Texas Democratic Party v. Abbott

Whether a Texas law requiring voters under the age of 65 to provide an excuse in order to vote by mail violates the 26th Amendment or the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

People First of Alabama v. Merrill

Whether the coronavirus pandemic requires alleviating the enforcement of three Alabama election provisions: that absentee ballots must be signed in the presence of a notary or two adult witnesses, that applications for absentee ballots must include copies of valid photo ID, and that counties may not offer curbside voting.

U.S. Supreme Court

Moore v. Circosta

Whether coronavirus-related changes implemented after the start of absentee voting by North Carolina elections officials to a number of absentee ballot procedures – extending the deadline to receive ballots, and modifying requirements for postmarking and third-party collection of them – violate the state legislature's power to regulate elections under the Constitution as well as the equal protection clause.

U.S. Supreme Court

Ohio Democratic Party v. LaRose

Whether Ohio state law bars election officials from providing more than one absentee-ballot drop box per county, in light of the state's expected increase in mail-in voting due to the coronavirus pandemic.Tenth District Ohio Court of Appeals

Jones v. Secretary of State of Maine

Whether the Maine constitution requires a full citizen-initiated referendum, as opposed to a "people's veto" effort, to repeal a ranked-choice voting law passed by the state legislature in July 2019 that went into effect in January 2020 without Gov. Janet Mills' signature.

U.S. Supreme Court

Democratic National Committee v. Bostelmann

Whether the coronavirus pandemic requires a number of changes to Wisconsin's election procedures, such as extending the deadline to return absentee ballots, permitting electronic delivery of those ballots for voters who do not receive them in time to mail them, and lifting the restriction on employing out-of-county poll workers.

U.S. Supreme Court

A. Philip Randolph Institute of Ohio v. LaRose

Whether, due to an expected increase in mail-in voting due to the coronavirus pandemic, Ohio's provision of one absentee-ballot drop box per county infringes upon the right to vote in violation of the First and 14th Amendments.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit

Raysor v. Desantis

Whether Florida's statutory requirement that prior felons pay all court costs and fees before regaining the right to vote is an unconstitutional poll tax under the 24th Amendment.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit

Donald J. Trump for President v. Way

Whether an executive order by the governor of New Jersey in light of the coronavirus pandemic that requires mail-in ballots to be sent to all registered voters in the state, and extends the deadline for submitting them, violates federal election law and the Constitution.

U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey

Donald J. Trump for President v. Cegavske

Whether recent changes by the state legislature to Nevada's voting procedures including, among other things, the expansion of voting-by-mail and a requirement that officials count ballots received up to three days after Election Day, violate federal election law and the Fourteenth Amendment.

U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada

Trump: I think this will end up in the Supreme Court and I think it's very important that we have nine justices (23 Sep 2020)

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/scotus-justice-election-ballots/2020/09/23/id/988460/

President Donald Trump predicted the U.S. Supreme Court will decide the outcome of the November election and argued the Senate should confirm his nominee to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to break any tie.

"I think this will end up in the Supreme Court and I think it's very important that we have nine justices, and I think the system's going to go very quickly," Trump said Wednesday at the White House, after criticizing the legitimacy of mail-in voting. He made the remarks during a meeting with Republican attorneys general about alleged anti-conservative bias of tech companies.

"I think this scam that the Democrats are pulling, it's a scam, this scam will be before the United States Supreme Court and I think having a 4-4 situation is not a good situation," Trump said. "Just in case it would be more political than it should be, I think it's very important to have a ninth judge."

Trump said Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., would not have to even hold a committee hearing for his nominee, but he expects him to.

"He wouldn't even actually have to hold one," Trump said. "Lindsey is going to call the date of the hearing as soon – you can't call it until you have a candidate. And once we have the nominee, I will wait to hear what the date is. But from that point, I would think it would be fairly quick."

Lawyers representing Trump's campaign are challenging mail-in voting rules in several states. The president has repeatedly claimed without evidence that mail-in voting is more susceptible to fraud than in-person voting on Election Day.

Trump plans Saturday at 5 p.m. ET to announce a nominee to replace Ginsburg, a liberal icon who died Friday at 87. Trump said Wednesday he is still considering a list of five women. He is likely to nominate Amy Coney Barrett, people familiar with the deliberations have said.

>>11693967

Lately?

>>11694201

A CIA nigger.

>>11694214

Sometime before November 3rd 2024.

>>11693864

He's taking action, right now, such as firing Krebs and heads up at the DoD, that are quite literally causing panic in regular folks still plugged into the reality most of us, and yourself, have boken away from.

Good luck moving forward, fren. It's going to get turbulent.

>>11694160

I signed up with Parler and haven't used it once. I'm waiting to see what the experiment produces.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/proof-fraud-democrat-votes-dekalb-ga-precinct-match-assad-syria-castro-cuba-kim-jong-uns-victory-margin/

MORE PROOF OF FRAUD: Democrat Votes in DeKalb County GA District Match Assad in Syria, Castro in Cuba and Kim Jong Un’s Victory Margin

Democrats Cheat — This is as true as the morning sun.

This year they overshot their fraud and got caught.

Advertisement - story continues below

A phony recount is taking place in Georgia is even exposing the Democrat fraud.

But even a phony recount with only 1 election observer at every 10 tables is exposing the Democrat fraud.

In Dekalb County election observers caught an impossible batch of votes for Biden.

Had this counting error not been discovered, Biden would have gained enough votes from this one batch alone to cancel out Trump’s gains from Fayette, Floyd and Walton.

— David Shafer (@DavidShafer) November 18, 2020

Joe Biden’s margin of victory in Dekalb matches tyrant Bashir Assad in Syria, Raul Castro in Cuba and Kim Jong Un in North Korea.

That’s how much they cheat!

Biden’s margin of victory in this batch of votes (99.9%) bested Bashar al-Assad’s 2007 margin (97.6%) and Raul Castro’s 2008 margin (99.4%). It matched Kim Jong-il’s 2009 margin (99.9%).

— David Shafer (@DavidShafer) November 18, 2020

FUCKING CHEATING CUNTS STILL TRYING TO CHEAT

Georgia Monitor Catches 9,626-Vote Error in Hand Recount

https://www.theepochtimes.com/georgia-monitor-catches-9626-vote-error-in-hand-recount_3584168.html

A recount monitor in Georgia discovered a 9,626-vote error in the hand recount in DeKalb County, according to the chairman of the Georgia Republican Party.

“One of our monitors discovered a 9,626-vote error in the DeKalb County hand count. One batch was labeled 10,707 for Biden and 13 for Trump—an improbable margin even by DeKalb standards. The actual count for the batch was 1,081 for Biden and 13 for Trump,” David Shafer wrote on Twitter on Nov. 18.

“Had this counting error not been discovered, Biden would have gained enough votes from this one batch alone to cancel out Trump’s gains from Fayette, Floyd, and Walton,” Shafer added, referring to the three Peach State counties which discovered memory cards with uncounted votes on Monday and Tuesday.

Shafer said that two official counters signed off on the miscounted batch. GOP attorneys turned over an affidavit (pdf) on the incident to the Georgia secretary of state and requested an investigation.

“We were limited to one monitor for every 10 counting tables and we were kept some distance from the tables. There is no telling what we missed under these unreasonable restrictions,” Shafer said.

Fayette, Floyd, and Walton counties discovered uncounted votes on Monday and Tuesday with each batch favoring President Donald Trump. The discovered votes cut former Vice President Joe Biden’s lead in the state by more than 1,400 votes.

Georgia’s deadline to complete the recount is at 11:59 p.m. on Wednesday. The state is scheduled to vote on whether to certify the results of the 2020 election on Friday.

The recount in progress was initiated by Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger based on a new law that calls for an audit of one race after each election. The Trump campaign has challenged the recount process, asserting that it is meaningless unless it includes an audit of the voters’ signatures.

The office of the secretary of state did not respond to a request for comment.

Georgia officials are probing the handling of the presidential election in the state’s largest county. Officials are seeing “managerial sloppiness” and “chain of custody” issues in Fulton County, which has a population of about a million and includes Atlanta, Gabriel Sterling with the secretary of state’s office told reporters on Tuesday.

Raffensperger said Tuesday that an audit of voting machines was completed with no signs of foul play. Voting systems testing company Pro V&V conducted the audit and “found no evidence of the machines being tampered.”

The Trump campaign has alleged that voting machines and software by Dominion Voting Systems switched votes from Trump to Biden. Dominion denied the allegations.

>>11694357

^^^^^^^^^

This is getting absolutely insane. I'm a fairly hardened anon in this, so far, and it's becoming impossible to see we're quite literally surrounded with disinfo. Even the people we're supposed to be a little more trusting of seem to be putting out countermeasures to throw folks off. Yes, that includes anons.

Trump: Wayne County Canvassers Were Threatened, Harassed Over Votes

https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-wayne-county-canvassers-were-threatened-harassed-over-votes_3584135.html

The two Republicans who voted against certifying election results in Michigan on Tuesday night before reversing themselves were threatened and harassed before changing their votes, President Donald Trump said on Nov. 18.

“At first they voted against because there were far more VOTES than PEOPLE (Sad!),” Trump wrote on Twitter.

“Then they were threatened, screamed at, and viciously harassed, and were FORCED to change their vote, but then REFUSED, as American patriots, to sign the documents. 71 [percent] MESS. Don’t Harass!”

Trump had weighed in on the situation in Wayne County just after the initial vote, calling the two GOP canvassers courageous.

“Wow! Michigan just refused to certify the election results! Having courage is a beautiful thing. The USA stands proud!” he added.

Wayne County Board of Canvassers Chairwoman Monica Palmer and member William Hartmann voted against certifying the results, citing concern about incomplete information in the county’s poll books.

Democrats Jonathan Kinloch and Allen Wilson voted for certification, resulting in a 2–2 deadlock.

That’s when members of the public began berating Palmer and Hartmann for the vote.

“I just want to let you know that the Trump stink, that the stain of racism, that you, William Hartmann and Monica Palmer, have just covered yourself in is going to follow you throughout history. your grandchildren are going to think of you like Bull Conner or George Wallace,” said Ned Staebler, a vice president at Wayne State University who accused them of being “ordered to do it.”

“When you go to meet your maker, your soul is going to be very, very warm,” he added.

A number of other speakers brought up the children of the Republicans while claiming their decision was racist.

“You are standing here today telling folks that black Detroit should not have their votes counted. And know the facts: you are certainly showing that you are a racist,” state Rep.-elect Abraham Aiyash, a Democrat, said.

“I hope that your name lives in infamy of being [sic] disenfranchising voters races and continuing Jim Crow laws and the attitude of Jim Crow into 2020,” Rev. Wendell Anthony, a pastor and head of the Detroit branch of the National Association of the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), added.

Trische Duckworth of the Survivors Speak organization said Palmer committed an atrocity and got mad that Palmer had left the room.

“If she did not want to take this lashing, she should have voted to certify these votes,” Duckworth added.

Hartmann and Palmer reversed their votes after the public comment period, on the condition that the secretary of state’s office conduct a comprehensive audit of “the unexplained precincts” in the county. The audit should be filed with state lawmakers and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat, the county board said.

A request for an interview with Palmer and Hartmann sent to the county clerk wasn’t immediately returned.

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat, called the discrepancies in Wayne County “bookkeeping errors” on Wednesday and hailed the reversal as the right thing to do.

Data Scientist Discovers Unusual Change in Votes

https://www.theepochtimes.com/data-scientist-discovers-unusual-change-in-votes_3583097.html

Data scientist Sarah Eaglesfield says she discovered unusual changes in vote counts in several states during the 2020 election.

According to her research, nearly 60 counties across the United States had ballots removed from the total count after they’d been counted.

She said that the changes in data indicate the vote-counting software, known as Dominion Voting Systems, is flawed.

Based on her analysis, ballots in Wayne County, Michigan were counted more than once. Numbers show that ballots with the same voter ID appeared several times in the vote-counting software.

She explained she feels the discrepancies combined with evidence of dead voters make it impossible for anyone to determine what the real election results were.

Sarah Eaglesfield said: “Any news or any figures that are being fed back to you, they might be accurate within a few hundred thousand, but they’re not going to be the accurate result for the state, unless there’s been a hand count, and I believe all the states do need to audit what they’re turning over.”

Since the topic was first mentioned, many major media outlets dismissed the possibility of voter fraud and other forms of election interference, including glitches in vote-counting software.

Sarah said it’s integral for a fair election to report accurate figures.

Lawsuits filed by the Trump Campaign in the battleground states are still pending.

>>11694393

If Q is successful, you might not have any strip clubs left. Then again, if Q's main purpose is to shift the overton window to the right as far as the rubber band will stretch just to squeeze another century or 2 out of the greatest human experiment ever (USA), then we might see by the time we're all in our 90s strip clubs making a comeback.

There's no doubt that US Marshalls are making leaps and bounds of progress against trafficking networks, and that's the biggest part of all this that keeps many anons hanging in there. The mass disinfo campaign has to be wearing on even the most experienced professionals.

>>11694416

>The mass disinfo campaign has to be wearing on even the most experienced professionals.

We're not stuck here with them my dearest Anon, they're stuck here with us.

>>11694112

We have several family friends that took themselves and their kids to get tested. Signed in with their contact info and decided after waiting over an hour that they would come back and left the testing office. 3 days later, after NOT taking a test, all of them received phone calls that they and their kids were positive.

>>11694422

Chances are, you are doing it for free right now. Sure, anons usually get a good portion of whatever they spread as truth, but there's never 100% truth in all we do. That's what makes this so difficult and tiring. I had to stop getting on my soapbox once I realized just how surrounded we are:

>>11694395

And while I'm hopeful of this: >>11694434

I can assure you that it became obvious we're even operating in the devil's den when the recent rift happened over bakers and recently installed BVs. Sure, they've kept the CP down, but that's just what's legally required to keep a board running. The new crew often has impersonators of old personalities to coat the place in some semblance of familiarity, while continuing the facade.

>>11694467

>>11694495

So you think that Q's seemingly avid endorsement of Christianity isn't an indicator that they want this all to at least appear as biblical as possible? If you can read between the lines on that question, you might just be ready for what the 99% can't handle.