>>11692948 (pb)

No sauce, no names, no facts. Pure BS.

>>11692987 (pb)

>Anonymous source for MSM: Durham is scared and won't do nuttin.

Here's sauce, names, facts which say Durham is a strawman: <https://www.newstarget.com/2020-11-17-sham-durham-afraid-blowback-biden-admin-dropping-russiagate.html>

"But now, according to The Federalist’s co-founder Sean Davis, the U.S. attorney Barr assigned to conduct a probe into the origins of the Comey-run FBI’s undermining operation against Trump’s campaign, John Durham, has reportedly said despite the fact that he could indict several people, he isn’t going to."

>>11693801

>are they lying?

>And if they are, is that some kind of treason?

Yes, and yes. Due process calls for these things to be examined by a jury in a court of law before We the People can hang the treasonous dirtbags though.