Sorry, no, what I meant was that the original mention by you >>1169881 responding to >>1169774 on (Sec 11A P 2.2) might be related to the EO signed 12/21, when POTUS declared a state of emergency over corruption & human rights abuses. Therefore the section you cited would be applicable since a SoE was already declared by him.
>definition buried in the code that defines specific violations - that triggers THIS
>§1701. Unusual and extraordinary threat; declaration of national emergency; exercise of Presidential authorities (a) and (b)
>( Pub. L. 95–223, title II, §202, Dec. 28, 1977, 91 Stat. 1626 .)
I'm sorry, I don't mean to bog you down, and I know this is complicated (buried in other PL/EOs etc) - I just wanted to ask a friendly lawfag if that was a correct application (linking the 12/21 EO to your response on the original citation) or not.